He deals with being a sugar daddy. No I'm kidding. I don't know because I don't know what double daddy is. Details!
Kant's distinction between guardians and minors is based on the propensity of people to dwell in their own immaturity and let others take care of them. Both guardians and minors are victims of this propensity; only, they are placed on the opposite poles. Neither guardians nor minors dare to think for themselves. However, minors almost entirely give up their intellectual potential, indulging in their own laziness of the mind. They rely on different types of guardians. For example, priests are the guardians of their souls; physicians are the guardians of their bodies; politicians are the guardians of their social order, etc. Basically, they are lulled in their comfortable positions of non-thinkers. We have to say, though, that Kant doesn't judge on people for being one or the other. He just proposes that they can rise above those passive positions with the help of enlightenment.
The reader should find the meaning of each words. Then, write it on your paper or top of the vocab.
Well first lets examine the reading. i like to highlight and add notes. lets think about this. if the charecter is talking about money, maybe there is an issue with the family's money. but at the end the charecter syas something very specific. lets see if you can figure it out by examining the kast sentence and adding a note! :)
