Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
1. The socio-political context when the kartilya was written was to fully understand their political and ethical code and purposes. To change the way people understood and behave towards the Katipunan.
2. The document of Kartilya in the 19th century the Philippines was crucial in the sense that it serves as the moral and diligent foundation utilized to oversee the actions of Katipuneros.
Besides, after joining the Katipunan, members were compelled to read the Kartilya and follow its code of conduct.
The way to achieve this impartiality – to free judges to decide cases based on what the law actually requires, and on nothing else – is to ensure that the judiciary is independent, or, put differently, not subject to reprisals for decisions on the bench.
But judicial independence is not an absolute or singular value defining our courts. The principle of judicial restraint is equally important – and it is inextricably linked to judicial independence. At one level, the tension between the two seems inescapable. But there is an important sense in which an independent judiciary and judicial restraint are flip sides of the same coin. Both aim to minimize the influence of extraneous factors on judicial decision-making. A judge must not decide a case with an eye toward public approbation, because whether a particular result is popular is irrelevant to whether it is legally sound. In the same way, a judge must not consult
Answer:
The answer is mentioned below.
Explanation:
In 1800 Europe start to take over Africa and this is called Scramble for Africa, which has changed the course of Africa forever. Europeans who considered them superior were on a civilizing mission and Africa prove to be important not only to prove their racial superiority but also for its rich natural resources. Industrializing European nations made it a matter of prestige to control more distant land to gain raw resources and market for their products.
