1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
meriva
3 years ago
15

What is one reason as to why the government would need to protect enterprise? A. give equal opportunity for business owners. B.

give small companies an advantage over big companies. C. give big companies more money then small business. D. control the growth of a company.
History
1 answer:
rosijanka [135]3 years ago
3 0
One reason why the government need to protect enterprise is : A. give equal opportunity for business owners.
Without government protection, it would be easy for bigger enterprise to play dirty tricks on the smaller startup. If the government let this happen, this will stunt the growth of US economy because we 70 % of our income relied on small enterprise

hope this helpss
You might be interested in
Who invented roads?????​
Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

The roads were built in three layers: large stones, a mixture of road material, and a layer of gravel. Two other Scottish engineers, Thomas Telford and John Loudon McAdam are credited with the first modern roads. They also designed the system of raising the foundation of the road in the center for easy water drainage.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best explains the outcome of Roe v Wade
marissa [1.9K]

C.Women gained the right to end pregnancies, while states gained the right to restrict abortions.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which phrase BEST defines the concept of inalienable rights?
Arturiano [62]

Answer:

I personally would choose C.

Explanation:

First off, I apologize if this is incorrect, but I believe it would be C for one reason. Inalienable rights means, people cannot remove them from you, if that makes sense. So, rights that are unable to be infringed upon, to me, would be the best option because "infringed" means to break, therefore, if you are unable to break the rights, they would be considered inalienable. Sorry if this was confusing.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following groups of people was the square deal not intended to benefit? A.laborers B.big bussiness trusts C. Farmer
Lyrx [107]
B big bussinesses i belive so


6 0
3 years ago
¿COMO EL PENSAMIENTO LIBERAL ESPAÑOL INFLUYO EN LA ELABORACION DE LA CONSTITUCION DE APATZINGAN?
yuradex [85]

Answer:

NO HABLO ESPAGNOL

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What legal tools did the Roman republic use to uphold the rule of law
    13·1 answer
  • explain the imbalance that existed in electoral districts prior to redrawing districts in 1964?what phrase did the supreme court
    15·1 answer
  • When did John B. Magruder leading a Confederate attack to take back Galveston
    11·1 answer
  • The little boy felt empathy for the homeless people he saw. His compassion grew as he walked to the store with his patient mothe
    9·1 answer
  • What was the situation in Berlin at the end of the second world war?
    11·1 answer
  • What are 3 facts important enough for us to learn about King George III?
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement is true about the relationship between a monopoly and its competition in a market?
    8·2 answers
  • 7. What river was located in French Territory just south of the Great Lakes?
    14·1 answer
  • Why do Americans have the right to take more land in North America?
    6·1 answer
  • Would students think nonviolent protesting is better or protesting online? Why?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!