Answer:
<u>Perhaps the greatest difficulty with utilitarianism is that it fails to take into account considerations of justice. We can imagine instances where a certain course of action would produce great benefits for society, but they would be clearly unjust.</u><u>Utilitarianism provides a guiding framework of decision making rooted in social benefit which helps direct business toward more ethical behavior. It is the basis for much of our discussion regarding the failures of Enron, Worldcom, and even the subprime mess and Wall Street Meltdown.</u><u>For example, by selling quality and safe products, a business will be increasing its intrinsic value while meeting the needs of their customers at the same time. Back to the concepts of pain and suffering; the ethical position of utilitarianism is that human beings should be happier and have less suffering.</u>
1. The heavy rain poured down on us, quickly soaking us to the bone
2. We were isolated floating on the surface of the sea when a huge wave nearly drowned us
3. The food was tasty, and we easily ate it all
4. The mountains were just breathtaking and that night, after breathing in all that fresh air, we slept instantly
5. We got off the aeroplane immediately, still not believing we had almost crashed it was the start of a thrilling holiday
He writer knows he has the audiences but he does not know who it is
*Select all that apply,* so there are several correct answers:
1. The men all stand together (“Soon the men began to gather... They stood together...”)
2. A pile of stones lies nearby (“...away from the pile of stones in the corner...”)
4. The town is made up of farmers (“...speaking of planting and rain, tractors and taxes...”)
We know it’s definitely not 5. because it states, “The women... came shortly after their men folk.” and there are no details I can see that suggest this specifically takes place in a city rather than a town/village/whatnot, so 3. is likely also wrong.
Hopefully this helped.
In <em>“Part Eight: The Word Shaker”,</em> changes come to Himmel Street.
The change that happens to Liesel is the change from an angry, distrusting character to one that has a strong sense of family and friends.
When the book comes to an end, she has strong personal morals and ethics and although they are challenging to enforce, she stands by them, despite turbulent and testing times.
<h3>What happened in the book?</h3>
This is the character development that centers on the main character, Liesel who is stubborn and strong-willed and always angry at something.
After Himmel Street is bombed, this brings about a perspective change to Liesel as her loved ones are killed by the blast and this shatters her world and she says farewell to Rudy, only after he is dead.
She goes home with the mayor and Frau Hermann arrives and takes Liesel home with them.
Liesel remains in mourning as she refuses to eat and keeps the ash of the Himmel Street bombings on her skin as a form of remembrance, funeral, or respect.
Read more about Liesel and Himmel Street here:
brainly.com/question/11394908
#SPJ1
