1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
arlik [135]
3 years ago
12

Which criterion is a requirement for naturalization as a US citizen?

History
1 answer:
klemol [59]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation:A). The person must be a lawful, permanent resident for five years.

You might be interested in
O autor do texto considera que a violência foi necessária para se enfrentar um mundo antigo que se defendia ferozmente. Que mund
faltersainse [42]

Answer:

Alexandre o grande

Explicação:

O autor do texto considera que a violência era necessária para enfrentar um mundo antigo que se defendia ferozmente e o mundo a que o autor se refere é o mundo de Alexandre, o Grande. Alexandre, o Grande, foi um grande rei cujo império se espalha pelo Oriente Médio. Por capturar as novas terras, eles travaram muitas guerras e, como sabemos na época, a violência era uma coisa comum e as pessoas responsáveis pela violência, também tentando se defender.

8 0
3 years ago
Why did Thomas Paine question British authonty to rule the colonies in Common Sense?
frozen [14]

Answer:

bcuz then they would reallyy mess up

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
According to the constitution who elects the president answers
aliina [53]
The electoral college elects the president.
I hope this helps.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify two reasons for the Indian partition.
iren [92.7K]
1. Congress leadership: Nehru and Gandhi underestimated Jinnah, Muslim League, its ambitions and outreach. In the 1920s, Gandhi neglected Jinnah and appealed to Muslims for a common cause, which seemed harmless at that time.In the 1930s, Nehru, assured of the backing of his socialist ideology and the support among the Muslim bases for the same, arrogantly believed that Muslims won't be moved by a party based on faith. It later turned out he was false.In the 1930s, Jinnah was willing to negotiate an agreement with the leadership, but was constantly ignored. This is going over my head. Arrogance and underestimation of someone doesn't go unpunished. However blame is to be equally shared by all the top leaders. In the 1940s, ML with almost a million members had no compulsion to bow out. He had no reason to cut a deal now. He was demanding recklessly. He refused to allow first independence , then partition. I may not comment on the course of history had this been allowed.While Gandhi tried his best possible to stop the painful separation, Nehru wasn't ready to the idea of Jinnah being the first Prime Minister of the independent India till the very end. Patel hoped partition would show Jinnah the fault in his ideas and would seal his fate. Thus the failure of Congress leadership and the rise of Jinnah is interlinked.
2. Jinnah and the Muslim League: He instigated religious passions and fears among the masses since the 30s.He was more concerned with the fact that Muslims and Hindus didn't intermarry or interdine and that Congress didn't have Muslim representatives in the 1946 Provincial Elections. He claimed in his 1940 Muslim League Presidential Address that cultures, literature and way of living and views on life were different of the two communities. The theory of one nation had been carried along too far and that it was nothing but a far fetched dream. I don't think partition gave too much peace either.The provinvcial elections were held on the lines of religion and demand for a new country, rather than on the promises of growth and "independence".Direct Action Day was a call by this great leader. What else do you expect from such a gathering at such a crucial point of time on such a critical issue. If countries could be made by gatherings and processions, I'm going out on the streets to demand the Shubham Kingdom! The violence, retaliation and counter violence led to the inevitable- Partition of two brothers, fighting for petty issues, not ready to listen and even the parents acting as stubborn kids.
4 0
3 years ago
What were patrick henry's most important objections to the new constitution?
nlexa [21]

Patrick Henry's most important objections to the new constitution was that it would make the federal government strong and thus pose a threat of tyranny. Henry dreaded a strong central government and even refused to take up positions in the federal government. As a result of his view, he actively opposed the ratification of the constitution.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was Hippocrates' personal contribution to the development of medicine. Please answer ASAP
    10·1 answer
  • Especially important in defining Catholic Church doctrine was the?
    7·1 answer
  • A major result of the Spanish-American War
    14·1 answer
  • What precedent set by the new deal have been put into play during periods of recession
    8·1 answer
  • ndex fossils were only alive during a specific time period and are used to estimate the unknown age of items *
    10·1 answer
  • According to the declaration of independence, what did the authors believe to be beyond question (obvious) regarding the general
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the poor peasent and the rich landlords participating in the civil disobidience movements​
    9·2 answers
  • Which aspect of world culture is reflected by these quotations, all from the mid-1960s? "Our children are copying American cultu
    7·1 answer
  • Describe the political, social, and economic changes that took place during the Qin dynasty. ​
    15·1 answer
  • 06.03 PLS HURRY
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!