Answer:
Perestroika and glasnost
One effect was the abrupt demand for Russian dictionaries in order to understand the content of Gorbachev's report.
Explanation:
In May 1985, Gorbachev gave a speech in Leningrad in which he admitted the slowing of economic development, and inadequate living standards. ... Gorbachev and his team of economic advisors then introduced more fundamental reforms, which became known as perestroika (restructuring).
Comparison of the American and French Revolutions.
The American Revolution (1775-1783) and French revolutions (1789-1799) are both very significant in the history of the world. They were similar in several ways considering that both revolutions were caused by economic struggles. The two revolutions began as a result of increased economic issues where their Monarchial governments imposed high taxes due to previous debts of war. The taxed people felt unrepresented which resulted to the revolts, protests, and secession of the third estate to oppose the government. Both Revolutions followed the enlightenment practice thus adopted constitutions. The revolutions differed in their goals as the French Revolution aimed at abolishing its government while the British aimed at achieving their independence following British traditions. The French Revolution led to the evolution of several wars outside France, unlike the American Revolution that remained to be against the British.
Similarities of the Revolutions are that both American and French Revolutions were deeply inspired by Enlightenment political thought revolving around human rights and freedom. The thought of revolutions caused the surge of a new belief in social order and recognised the need to run the government in a way that came from the consent of the people.
The difference of the revolution is seen considering the American Revolution never evolved into greater wars with other monarchies compared to the French Revolution which evolved into a series of wars with many countries throughout Europe. This was as a result of the French nobility that was unable to find foreign supporters for the king.
It can be noted that the French completely detached themselves from their original political, social, and cultural structure seeking to establish their own while the Americans, on the other hand, focused on independence from the British imperial rule but accepted to continue British social and cultural heritage.
This question refers to the text "An Apprenticeship Agreement from 1250" from the lesson <em>The Rise of Europe</em>.
In this text, we are able to see an agreement that was drafted between Ouede Ferconne and Matthew Haimart. In this agreement, Ferconne states that she agrees that her son Michael will become the apprentice of Haimart for four years in order to become a weaver. However, after two years, Ferconne will be able to legally purchase her son back.
There are several reasons why Ferconne might want to buy Michael back. Michael might not like the profession, and he might wish to change it. Moreover, Michael might be unhappy with Haimart. Michael might also believe that he has learned enough after two years, and that four are unnecessary. All of these reasons could lead Ferconne to purchase Michael back.
Answer:
Sumer was responsible for many inventions and important contributions to inventions of both the time and today. However, Sumerian city-states often fought with each other. They went to war for glory and more territory. This power - hungry people build walls to protect from invading armies looking to loot, pillage, and grow wealthy. The walls surrounded each city - state, closing them off from the rest of Mesopotamia. This lead to isolation, and more war. The city - states were constantly in a state of unrest.
Hope this helps! Have a great day! :D