1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liq [111]
3 years ago
12

Iran-contra affair uncovers reagan administration trading ""arms for hostages"" and funneling money to nicaraguan contras.True o

r False
History
1 answer:
Serjik [45]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:True

Explanation:the Iran–Contra scandal, or simply Iran–Contra, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo. The administration hoped to use the proceeds of the arms sale to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.

You might be interested in
Who was the leader of soviet union during cold war?
Rina8888 [55]
The leader of the Soviet Union during the Cold War was Vladimir Lenin. He was also the last leader of the Soviet Union.
6 0
3 years ago
Who was the inka king who began the conquests that led to the creation of their empire?
34kurt
Pachacuti was the king of Cusco. He would start the conquests capturing territory to the north around 1493. His son, Tupac Inca Yupanqui, would continue the conquests in 1471, after his father's death. He would conquer the territory to the south. 
7 0
3 years ago
What did the sharecropper have to do in order to use the plantation owner's land farming tools and mules
Evgen [1.6K]
The sharecropper has to work on the owners land and whatever crops they harvest has to be given to the owner in return for the use of the landowners items.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What kind of money is this??
svetoff [14.1K]
Flip it the other way
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What happens if the police illegally seize evidence in violation of the fourth amendment?
Tom [10]

In case that the police or any other authority proceeds against the right granted in the Fourth Ammendment, their findings, having been illegally obtained, can not be presented before any court as evidence against any individual, nor a judge could allow to have them as evidence in a trial, because this would ignore the Sixth Ammendment by violating the right to an impartial trial.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The timeline shows major changes in Russia’s history between 1910 and 1930. Which event best matches the year 1927?
    13·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast the advantages of both the north and the south during the civil war
    9·2 answers
  • What actions did the first and second Continental Congress take?
    8·1 answer
  • An election is being held in Licking County on Tuesday, May 8, between 6:30 a.m. and 7:30 p.m. The Pataskala Public Library need
    15·1 answer
  • 13. During the 1950s, the advent of _______ created the largest and fastest-growing impact on American society.
    15·1 answer
  • Need help with 5 a-d please
    10·1 answer
  • The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 was designed to help
    15·1 answer
  • How did damage to the U.S. Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor affect how the war was fought?
    7·2 answers
  • Please Help Me with this
    10·2 answers
  • How did the Fugitive Slave act effect people people from the north and people from the south?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!