Answer:
infection
Explanation:
Malaria is a mosquito-borne infectious disease that affects humans and other animals
<span>thinking about the casualties of war</span>
The first excerpt refers to the revenge theme. The second excerpt has isolation as its theme. The third excerpt has dangerous knowledge as a theme and the fourth excerpt has a deceptive appearance as a theme. (See attached figure.)
<h3>What are the themes?</h3>
- They are messages.
- They are teachings.
The theme is a lesson presented subjunctively in the text to convey a message to the reader. This message has a strong meaning and represents a sensitive and educating point of the text, which is shown in an impactful way.
The books usually have more than one theme, as is the case of Frankenstein which has themes such as revenge, isolation, danger, and deceptive appearance.
You did not show the excerpts that your question refers to, but it is possible to find a question similar to yours where these excerpts are presented.
You can see the complete question in the attached image.
Learn more about themes:
brainly.com/question/25336781
#SPJ1
Answer:
the one the question is refering to.
The writing 'rule' (myth) Churchill's reply satirizes is the 'Never end a sentence on a preposition' rule (i.g. as I intetionally did on the immediate sentence before this one). And his reply to it was something like 'This is the type of errant pedantry up with which I will not put.'
The 'rule' is a myth, yes, but of course what Churchill did was an exaggeration to sneeringly point out the ignorance of those who criticized him.
His sentence therefore was incorrect. One possible change to improve it could be: 'This is the type of errant pedantry which I will not put up with.'
Specially the 'up' and 'with' of 'put up with' could never go in the middle of a sentence, as 'put up with' is a phrasal verb, meaning the verb and the preposition must always be together in the correct order.
I was able to find some possible variations of what his sentence could have actually had been, but in none of them the 'up with' goes along with 'put', so either ways we can assume that his sentence was deliberately wrong.
Explanation:
brainly
