Limited government<span> is a concept in </span>political philosophy<span> in which governmental power is restricted by </span>law<span>, usually in a written </span>constitution<span>. It is a key concept in the </span>history of liberalism<span>. The </span>Magna Carta<span> and the </span>United States Constitution<span> represent important milestones in the limiting of governmental power. The earliest use of the term </span>limited government<span> dates back to </span>King James VI and I<span> in the late 16th century</span>
B. Oliver Cromwell led the Puritan forces against the king<span>
The English Civil War led to the rise of the Commonwealth. So option “b” is the correct option as far as the given question is concerned. This Commonwealth period started in the year 1640 and continues till 1660. During this Civil War period the authority of King Charles I was challenged by the people and this ultimately led to the execution of King Charles I. The son of Charles I again started the rule of Monarchy in the year 1660.
</span><span>They believed blacks were entitled to the same political rights and opportunities as whites. They also believed that confederate leaders should be punished for their roles in the civil war.<span>The Republican Radicals felt that extraordinary times called for direct intervention in state affairs and laws designed to protect the emancipated blacks. At the heart of their belief was the notion that blacks must be given a chance to compete in a free-labor economy. In 1866, the activist congress introduced a bill to extend the life of the Freedmen's Bureau and began work on a Civil Rights Bill.
</span></span>
Answer:
The 'separation of powers' was a fundamental theory of the early founding founders of the United States who believed in creating three different levels of government, the executive, legislative and the Judiciary in order to curtail the power of each and ensure that fair governance would prevail.
Explanation:
The writer points out that this view was mostly held by the staunch Federalists. However, anti-federalists were not in favour of three different levels of the government and believed that it might not be easy to govern when one division might have more power than the other. E.g. if the judiciary becomes more powerful than the executive branch or vice versa, it can not only lead to problems with governance but also intimation and corruption.
On the other hand, Federalists believed that these divisions would ensure, that one branch of the government keeps a check on the other.
Answer:
c selfless devotion
Explanation:
he's being selfless by dying for his sheep and hes devoted to keeping them alive
