The correct answer is D. The systematic mass slaughter of European Jews and and others in nazi concentration camps during world war II.
Explanation
The Holocaust was the mass murder of millions of people by the Nazi regime during World War II (1939 and 1945). During this period there was a radical persecution campaign against those considered as ‘inferior’ as the Nazis believed only the Aryan race should prevail and others should disappear, this included not only the Jewish population, but also gypsies, the disabled, Jehovah's Witnesses, homosexuals, and communists. Under this ideology, the Nazis created concentration camps and gas chambers that lead to mass murder through poor living conditions and asphyxiation by gas inhalation and many other laws and actions to end with those that were not considered fit for society. So, the correct anwer is D. The systematic mass slaughter of European Jews and and others in nazi concentration camps during world war II.
Hey there, mate. Here is your answer. If if it doesn't help, let me know.
Answer: Progressivism was the reform movement that ran from the late 19th Century through the first decades of the 20th Century, during which leading intellectuals and social reformers in the United States sought to address the economic, political, and cultural questions that had risen in the context of the rapid changes brought with the Industrial Revolution and the growth of modern capitalism in America. The Progressives believed that these changes marked the end of the old order and required the creation of a new order appropriate for the new industrial age.
Hope this helps.
~Karleif Westsson
Hello there!
Question #1
<span>What was established in the case of Miranda v. Arizona?
One aspect that they truly convened was the fifth amendment which were to require laws that conveyed certain things that would have to be considered and handled properly.
Question #2
</span><span>How does this affect the legal process?
This would affect is because before this, it was quite easier to acquire certain laws, and to easily dishonor them. But ever sense this came about, it was more serious.
Question #3
</span><span> In the case of U.S. v. Nixon, what did the court ultimately decide about the president with regard to rule of law?
They decided that the president does not inform or enforce the final decision. It would have to go into a process,and not a pure law straight abound.
I hope this helps you!</span>
