Answer:
Western European economies grew faster than those of Eastern Europe because of the Marshall Plan. The Marshall Plan was an economic reconstruction program that pumped billions of dollars of American investment into the Western European economies. The founding of European Economic Community, a forerunner of the EU, expedited the growth process. Meanwhile, eastern European countries had begun to embrace communism and were soon under the control of state run economies, which limited access to profitable international markets, and were under the de facto rule of the Soviet Union under a series of communist dictators.
Explanation:
The Catholic Reformation,
on the one hand, unflinchingly reaffirmed all disputed doctrines and practices.
But tacitly it also accepted the legitimacy of some of the reformist criticisms.
Attempts were made to counter popular superstitions through catechizing. Serious
efforts were made to reform the structures of the Church so that it could be seen
primarily as a spiritual entity. Above all, as in the work of St. Ignatius Loyola
and the great Spanish mystics, it responded to that thirst for genuine interiority
that has been characteristic of believers in every age.
Dude, that's strait-up cheating. That's not what this site is for. You should at least try before asking for help.
David Wilmot was a Pennsylvania-born congressman who opposed slavery. His "proviso"—a clause tacked on to a number of legislation being debated in Congress—prohibited slavery in all of the new territory won from Mexico following the Mexican War. Although the proviso was well-liked in the North, it was vehemently opposed by the South and never became a part of the legislation. It declared that slavery would be outlawed in any new area that the United States might take over from Mexico. The argument over whether slavery still exists in the West was rekindled.
A case serving as precedential means that Judges in later cases use that case as the bench mark for how to rule on a particular issue.
So, Marbury v. Madison stands for notion that the Judiciary can review the actions of the legislative and executive branch to determine constitutionality. Later courts would cite Marbury v. Madison as precedent in cases that involved judicial review of legislative action.