Answer:
Because they serve as the major importer of foreign goods, and readily available markets for local goods.
Explanation:
European trading companies which were very common around the fifteenth century going forward such as the British East India Company, the Hudson's Bay Company, the Dutch East India Company, and the Dutch West India Company, became an inevitable part of the politics and economy of South India” and other regions of Asia in the period 1450–1750 "Because they serve as the major importer of foreign goods, and readily available markets for local goods."
Through trade, taxes, and other tariffs, they were a major source of money for the different empires in these regions, thereby becoming an inevitable part of the politics and economy of south India.
After the fall of both Robespierre and the Committee of Public Safety, the directory took control under five leaders.
The Supreme Court case that found the use of the grandfather clause unconstitutional is the Guinn v. United States, 238 U.S. 347 (1915). In its decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the grandfather clause<span> exemptions to </span>literacy tests<span> were unconstitutional. It declared the grandfather clauses as </span><span>repugnant to the Fifteenth Amendment and therefore null and void.</span>
Think about the idea here and you'll see how the idea of "cost" is inevitable in every decision. (It's true not just of governments, but of our own decisions too -- but we'll focus on governments here.)
Let's say the government decides it wants all citizens to have access to health care. Well, that's going to cost dollars to pay for that health care. Where will those dollars come from?
Let's say the government decides, in response to school shootings or other acts of gun violence, to ban certain types of guns or ammunition. That costs something to the gun dealers who were making money off those sales (and they'll object). Or let's say the government decides to do further and deeper background checks on all gun buyers. Well, that will cost something in terms of personnel and processes to accomplish all the background checks. Or let's say the government decides to increase mental health screenings and treatment because persons with mental illness issues may become violent and dangerous to society. That will cost much in order to organize and carry out better mental health intervention across the country.
I focused on just a couple issues there (health care, gun control). But the same principle holds on anything government does. You can think about your own examples that you'd want to use. Anything the government decides to do comes with some sort of costs attached. That doesn't mean it's bad to make such decisions -- it just means we need to count the cost and invest our efforts where they will have the best benefit.
The correct answer is : patricians
