Answer: let-government-do-it
Explanation:
The narrow corporate social responsibility has to do with the fact that corporations and businesses already contribute a positive quota to tye economy by generating revenue when they make profit, which they use in supporting the wages of employees, provision of employment, investments opportunities, and payment of taxes.
The argument believes that government should be allowed to do some other things.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
The estimation of the net present value is shown below:
= Present value of all yearly cash inflows after applying discount factor - initial investment
where,
The Initial investment is $180,000
All yearly cash flows would be
= Annual cost savings × PVIFA for 8 years at 12%
= $35,000 × 4.9676
= $173,886
Refer to the PVIFA table
Now set these values to the formula above
So, the value would equal to
= $173,886 - $180,000
= -$6,134
Since the net present value is negative, so the project should not be accepted
Answer:
a. positive
b. normative
c. positive
d. normative
Explanation:
Note that a normative statement as used in economics refers to a view of what should be done, or how things or policies should be or not be. While the Positive statement gives a point blank description of what the state of things are.
a. It is a fact of course that in the past decades U.S. companies have outsourced millions of job overseas, thus this is a positive (descriptive) statement.
b. By saying companies that outsource jobs are acting immorally indicates a normative or judgemental view of what is morally right.
c. This statement is a fact, because such actions is in line with economic theory; in effect would stop outsourcing jobs.
d. This is rather a view of what should be done. Which clearly indicates the statement as normative.
Answer:
Being More Responsive to Customer’s Unique Product Requirements with Short-Notice Production Flexibility is the New Normal.
Explanation:
