Answer:
The independent variable in the experiment is A. the jar covers.
Explanation:
The independent variable in an experiment represents the thing that the person conducting the experiment changes or alters. One group in the experiment had covers (this represents the experimental group) and the other group had no cover (this represents the control group which was not exposed to the independent variable). Since the only thing that Redi changed between the two groups was whether or not the jars were covered, this represents the independent variable.
The number of jars and the contents of the jars were constant in both experiments, and the number of maggots on the meat is the dependent variable (the result of changing the independent variable).
Hope this helps!
Well I'm not exactly certain where the teacher is going with this, but an often used example is red blood cells (RBCs) aka: erythrocytes.
RBCs are suspended in blood plasma as they flood through vessels around and around the body, so the osmolarity (amount of small particles that affect osmosis) must remain relatively constant. This is termed "isotonic", meaning the same amount of osmosis-influencing particles that are there inside the RBCs' cytosol, within their plasma membranes.
If the plasma osmolarity get too high, called hypertonic (as with extra salt particles) then water inside the RBCs will have an osmotic force driving it out of the cells' membranes, to flow where there are more salt particles. This will lead to cell shrinkage (called "crenation").
Counter to that, if the plasma osmolarity gets too low, as due to low plasma salt with excessive water intake (for example from the condition "water intoxication"), then the plasma will be hypotonic with respect to the intracellular cytosol concentration. This can result in water rushing into the RBCs' membranes via osmosis, causing the cells to swell from discs into spheres (balls), or even rupture and burst (a phenomenon called "hemolysis").
HOPE THOSE EXAMPLES HELP!!
Answer:
composition of meteorites
Explanation:
The continental drift theory has been based upon several evidence. The shape and perfect fit of South America and Africa is one of those evidence. The fossil records are another very strong evidence, as there are fossils of the same species on different continents that are not connected to each other in the present, and in nature is practically impossible to have the same species in different continents. The evidence about the climate also suggests that the continents have been moving, as there are remains of glaciers at places that nowadays are deserts and savannas. The meteorites are not one of the evidence though, and their composition doesn't have anything to offer in this tehory, as their composition is not related to the Earth and the processes on it.
It is to grow, create, and repair the living organism
