Answer:
high clean-energy startup costs
Explanation:
Protecting the environment means improving its sustainability and reducing pollution to the barest minimal. This utterly means terminating every activity that contributes to pollution in the environment, including the source of energy. The most widely used source of energy is the non-renewable source e.g. coal, fuel, etc.
These source of energy, however, release pollutants in form of greenhouse gases, into the environment. One way to eliminate the use of non-renewable source of energy is to adopt the use of renewable sources e.g. solar energy, wind etc. However, one major setback to doing this is the high production cost involved.
Although these sources of energy (renewable) are referred to as green or clean, but they have really expensive startup costs and are unaffordable most times.
Agriculture just became easier. It was much easier and safer than directly hunting, albeit, it wasn’t always as rewarding, but it was much more reliable. If you could hold off until the large crop was fully grown with hunting, you could rely on the large crop while waiting for the next one, and have a berth large growth. In other words, it was more reliable, easier, and could be very lucrative.
It would mostly effect
the wildlife that is
there
The answer is 5.2 x 10^4.
Extra carbon can only lead to extra growth if plants have a use for it
