1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RSB [31]
3 years ago
14

WILL MARK BRAINLIEST (if more than 1 people answer)

English
2 answers:
Sveta_85 [38]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

a person in  a cave could be living a wild loife but we may never knowm what goes on in their it could be just a hicker that was lost but mesa verde is not real i hook it up not evan real imformational about the article

Explanation:

Nadusha1986 [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Imagine living in a home built into the side of a cliff. The Ancestral Puebloan peoples, formerly known as the Anasazi, did just that in some of the most remarkable structures still in existence today. Beginning after 1000-1100 CE, they built more than 600 structures into the cliff faces of the Four Corners region of the United States: the southwestern corner of Colorado, northwestern corner of New Mexico, northeastern corner of Arizona, and southeastern corner of Utah. These structures were mostly residential but some were used for storage and ritual.

From 500–1300 CE, Ancestral Puebloans who lived at Mesa Verde were sedentary farmers who cultivated beans, squash, and corn. Corn originally came from what is today Mexico at some point during the first millennium of the Common Era. Originally most farmers lived near their crops, but this shifted in the late 1100s when people began to live near sources of water and often had to walk longer distances to their crops.

Why were the cliffs abandoned?

The cliff dwellings at Mesa Verde were abandoned around 1300 CE After all the time and effort it took to build these beautiful dwellings, why did people leave the area? Cliff Palace was built in the twelfth century. Why was it abandoned less than a hundred years later? These questions have not been answered conclusively, though it is likely that the migration from this area was due to either drought, lack of resources, violence, or some combination of these factors.

Explanation:

i did a project on this last year your welcome so all i had to do is copy it from my already existing doc.

You might be interested in
Summarizing is not __________. A. writing down every tiny little detail B. condensing a longer text C. writing a brief condensed
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer: A

Explanation: because you don't need unimportant details

6 0
4 years ago
Which of the following are HR practices that promote diversity in an<br> organization?
blsea [12.9K]
I would say C. Not 100% sure but that’s my answer!

I hope this could help!
4 0
3 years ago
How do you write an Expository essay? About comparing themes?
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

when you write an expository essay first of all you start by writing the essay con la mano compa lol


5 0
4 years ago
Essays and speeches may combine exposition and description. True or False?
iragen [17]
False, an essay is a lot more detailed then a speech and a speech is written and spoken by you 
8 0
3 years ago
IT CAN BE ABT ANYTHING- PLS HELP. Look back through your research outline. You should have answered your research question. Ther
KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer:

There have been a lot of complaints recently about our school's "no snacking in class" policy. Some students seem to believe they should be free to munch on whatever they like, whenever they choose. I admit there are some valid arguments for allowing food and drinks in the classroom. Overall, though, I think the principal's decision to uphold the snacking ban is a wise one.

Food in the classroom could actually create a lot of noise. It is easy to say that one person eating a crunchy food like potato chips does not make that much noise, but what happens when there are twenty people crunching, crinkling bags, ripping open packages, and gulping down juice? I think it could easily make it more difficult to hear what the teacher is saying. All of these sounds would be a nightmare for me, because I find it difficult to focus on my work when there is a lot of background noise.

Students may say they will clean up after themselves, but I think we all know that letting food and drinks into the classroom would create a huge mess. No matter how careful students are, there are bound to be spills and crumbs. Just imagine how it would feel to arrive at your desk only to find the seat is sticky and the desktop is littered with cracker fragments.

Next, there is the issue of what students will be snacking on. Some students would make healthy choices. They might pack apple slices or carrot sticks with dip. They would choose to drink water or milk; however, there are many others who would decide to drink soda or eat chips and candy bars. Unhealthy snacks do not have much nutritional value at all. They are full of empty calories, and eating too many of them can lead to health problems. The school would probably want to discourage students from eating garbage. This gives teachers yet another responsibility. Instead of making them the "snack police," it is easier to just keep food out of the classroom.

Allowing snacking in the classroom is not just noisy and messy. For some students, it could also be dangerous. Some students at our school are allergic to certain foods. If they are exposed to them, there could be serious consequences. They might feel sick to their stomach or get itchy. If they are extremely allergic to the food, they might even have trouble breathing and need to go to the hospital. The scary thing is, it may not take very much of a food to trigger an allergic reaction. Keeping all foods and drinks out of the classroom will help keep students with food allergies safe. There is no doubt that all snacks are not created equal. A vitamin–packed banana is clearly more nutritious than a sugar–filled bag of banana–flavored candy. Some may view the fact that students might make unhealthy choices as a reason to keep snacks out of class. Letting snacks in class provides teachers with a superb chance to educate students about making good food choices. They can talk to the class as a whole or to single students about the difference between good snacks and bad snacks. They might even choose to ban junk food outright. These lessons could stay with and help students throughout their lives.Some people worry about the potential noise and mess that will result if food and drinks are allowed into the classroom. They also worry about food allergies. The benefits of allowing food into the classroom outweigh these downsides, though. In addition, these possible problems could be fully avoided by creating some rules students need to follow and introducing some new classroom routines. For instance, students might be told they cannot bring "noisy foods" into the classroom. Teachers could post a list of foods that are banned because some students are allergic to them. Teachers could also give students just a couple of minutes close to the end of class to throw away empty wrappers and wipe up spills.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the value of WATCHING a speech over READING it? Please explain in a paragraph. WILL MARK complete answer BRAINLIEST!! 26
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements demonstrates intrinsic motivation?
    13·2 answers
  • Who might be the main characters in a world parents type of creation story?
    7·2 answers
  • Do you think most of the news reports you receive are true? Why or why not?
    7·2 answers
  • Which statement about poetry is accurate
    15·1 answer
  • Select three sentences from the passage that best
    6·1 answer
  • Question 5 of 10
    6·1 answer
  • Read the following passage:
    6·1 answer
  • Drag each label to the correct location on the image.
    7·2 answers
  • 10 points to whoever can answer this for meeee
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!