Answer:
ISSUE Whether flag burning constitutes "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment. RULING Yes. REASONING (5-4) The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment.
Explanation:
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the American flag enforced in 48 of the 50 states.
I don't know what your options were, but here are some stated purposes of war (stated formally or informally):
-removal of Saddam Hussein from the power
-being able to check for any existing biological, chemical or nuclear weapons that Hussein might have
-introducing democracy to Iraq:
Answer:
temporal
Explanation:
A subject participates in a study in which he has to first identify the object and then mentally rotate the object 180 degrees. The subject is unable to correctly rotate the object 180 degrees. This subject probably has damage to the temporal region of the brain.
Answer: A.) He launched an attack against the us army to stop american indian removal
Explanation: i did the quiz and got it right <3
