Answer:
$100; $75
Explanation:
Given that:
- Tax revenue falls by 100 million dollars
- marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.75.
Due to the fall in tax revenue, disposable income will increase by the same amount, that is, $100 million.
Consuption spending will initially increase by $75 million, as shown below:
= MPC × tax revenue fall
= 0.75 × $100,000,000 = $75,000,000
Answer: D
Explanation:
Competing on cost is based on achieving maximum value as perceived by the customer.
The total product cost per unit under absorption costing is: $75.
In absorption costing, the cost of every unit produced is worked out by adding up the direct cost of materials, direct labor, variable overhead, and the fixed overhead. Unlike in the case of marginal costing where the fixed cost is treated as period cost, in absorption costing, fixed cost is treated as a product cost.
The cost per unit
$
Direct material 28
Direct labor 24
Variable overhead 10
Fixed cost 13
Cost per unit 75
Cost of Inventory
Number of units = 1000
Cost per unit = $75
Value = 1000 * $75 = $75,000
Learn more about absorption costing here:brainly.com/question/26276034
#SPJ4
Answer:
7.5 Years
Explanation:
The computation of the payback period of the given machine is shown below:
<u>Year Initial outflow Cash flow Cumulative cash flow</u>
(52000)
1 10,000 10,000
2 10,000 20,000
3 10,000 30,000
4 8,000 38,000
5 8,000 46,000
6 2,000 48,000
7 2,000 50,000
8 4,000 54000
9 4,000 58000
10 4,000 62000
Now the Payback period is
= Completed years+ required cash ÷ annual cash inflow
= 7 years + 2000 ÷ 4000
= 7.5 Years
Answer:
Yeah, her argument will be good in Aceves. The further explanation is given below.
Explanation:
The promissory clause applies to just the requirement that although no attorney seems to be legal, a commitment is actionable. This happens whenever the Promiser already made that commitment to something like the Promisee who performs mostly on commitment.
- Aceves having operated throughout the specific situation mostly on the foundation of the Bank's commitment or withdrew its complaint. Therefore in this circumstance, the essential requirement that perhaps the promisee would have focused mostly on promiser is accomplished.
- Consecration of promise to pay estoppels is founded on either the ideals of equity as well as justice. The lender's action was unreasonable to Aceves and because of that, the premise would be effective on either the bank as to when the applicant was working on a pledge basis. Thus Aceves will be accurate in her argument.
