Answer:
Letter B is correct. <u>Narrowing the gap between theory and practice.</u>
Explanation:
Case study is an investigative methodological approach applied to simple or applied social sciences. It is carried out through the use of different qualitative methods for the collection of data and information relevant to the foundation of the research. The qualitative method is the most appropriate in a case study, as it occurs through subjective and not substantially statistical means of in-depth analysis of relevant factors in an event, an individual, an institution, a group and others.
Case studies can be classified as:
- exploratory,
- descriptive, or
- explanatory.
So it is correct to state that the purpose of the case study is to reduce the difference between theory and practice. Because the analysis of the information collected and the variables and patterns found will provide subsidies for the discussion and better understanding and reasoning between what happens between the theory and the practice analyzed in the case study.
I think it’s C, please forgive me if I’m wrong
$3,115,770 is the cost of goods sold for the company.
<h3>What are goods ?</h3>
In economics, "goods" are things that fulfill human needs and provide utility, such as to a customer buying a fulfilling product. Services that cannot be transferred and transferable products are two categories that are frequently distinguished.
When a good is helpful to people but is in short supply compared to demand, it is said to be a "economic good" and requires human effort to attain. Free things, on the other hand, like air, are always available and don't require any deliberate effort to obtain. Private goods include anything a person owns or uses on a regular basis that is unrelated to food, such as televisions, living room furnishings, wallets, cell phones, etc.
To learn more about goods from the given link:
brainly.com/question/12802278
#SPJ4
Answer:
The government agency is providing basic and/or essential services that further deepen the interests of members of the public
Explanation:
The assertion that a firm with a monopoly power loses it freedom of contract is very true. Monopolies by its realities come with features that ultimately cater for the interests of the firm, instead of the consumers. One of these is charging an astronomical high price on a particular item of commodity, and not taking cognizance of the purchasing power of the public. A firm could to this, and ultimately get away because its the only delivering such services - the one with the enormous monopoly power. Here, there is no stiff competition among goods that may offer liberty of choices to ordinary consumers.
To mitigate these numerous power of monopolies, governmental body has been giving the power to regulate and maintain an oversight functions. They now determine the provisions of contracts. The main objective of government agency, thus, is to ensure a firm with a monopoly power considers the basic and essential interests of the members of the public - the end users. Here, members of the public are insulated from unnecesary exploitation by the monopolies.
