All of these would be perfectly fine represented by a pie chart except A, which doesn't add to 100%.
The question seems to be getting at the idea that a pie chart might be better when the slices are all visually different sizes. I don't really think that's right; a pie chart for D say, where the two slices are about the same, gives the correct impression of the relative frequencies, which are about the same.
Answer they're looking for: C
Answer:
n = 8
Step-by-step explanation:
The product of the parts of one chord is equal to the product of the parts of the other chord, that is
3n = 4 × 6 = 24 ( divide both sides by 3 )
n = 8
Answer:
159cm
Step-by-step explanation:
Sum of all sides of triangles is 180
so, 15+6=21
then 180-21=159
Answer:
pi*36*10 = 1131 cubic feet
Step-by-step explanation:
MARK AS BRAINLEST!!
Assuming these are 4^(1/7), 4^(7/2), 7^(1/4) and 7^(1/2), the conversion process is pretty quick. the denominator, or bottom, of your fraction exponent becomes the "index" of your radical -- in ∛, "3" is your index, just for reference. the numerator, aka the top of the fraction exponent, becomes a power inside the radical.
4^(1/7) would become ⁷√4 .... the bottom of the fraction becomes the small number included in the radical and the 4 goes beneath the radical
in cases such as this one, where 1 is on top of the fraction radical, that number does technically go with the 4 beneath the radical--however, 4¹ = 4 itself, so there is no need to write the implied exponent.
4^(7/2) would become √(4⁷) ... the 7th power goes with the number under your radical and the "2" becomes a square root
7^(1/4) would become ⁴√7 ... like the first answer, the bottom of the fraction exponent becomes the index of the radical and 7 goes beneath the radical. again, the 1 exponent goes with the 7 beneath the radical, but 7¹ = 7
7^(1/2) would become, simply, √7
