B is the answer?!? Sorry if im wront
Answer:
First, the activity that humans execute that affects their ecosystem positively is reforestation. Second, the activity that humans execute that affects their ecosystem positively is hunting. Their effects rely completely in nature, however, one improves the ecosystem by making it greener and increasing the space nature has to grow, while the other impacts the ecosystem negatively by unbalancing the food chain.
Explanation:
The reasons behind this answer are that in the first place the ecosystem is a very sensitive environment that can be affected by a wide range of factors. In the first place, reforestation helps the environment have better conditions for the animals that live in it, as well as to provide the human race a better quality of air, water and feel better after living in a more natural ecosystem. While hunting breaks the ecosystem's balance because it allows the food chain of the ecosystem to break and allow a general modification.
Question is which is NOT a good technique.
Answer is "B" and here's why:
A) Clear questions -- good. People understanding the question will answer accurately.
C) Large sample size -- good. Answers will be more accurate with more people asked (like if you flip a coin 1,000 times its going to be closer to 50% heads than if you only flipped it twice)
D) Random sample -- good. Avoids your own bias in choosing who to ask.
B) Push poll -- bad. Pretends to be unbiased, the pollster's real objective is to get a person thinking in a way that is to their advantage. Some political candidates do this just before elections.
Hunter-gatherer societies are often nomadic. I believe.
anabolic synthesis is another name for the process
