Explanation:
For a theorem that says "if A then B", the converse is "if B then A."
__
The hing.e theorem has numerous parts to the hypothesis. Its converse retains many of those conditions, swapping only the relation between the included angle and the third side.
<u>theorem</u>: if two sides of one triangle are congruent to two sides of another, then the longest third side will be opposite the largest included angle.
<u>converse</u>: if two sides of one triangle are congruent to two sides of another, then the largest included angle will be opposite the longest third side.
Instead of relating the third side to the angle measure, the converse relates the angle measure to the third side.
I think the answer is B! I hope that helps!!!!!
BRAINLY would be appreciated❤️
Answer:
It's wrong because the y intercepts are different
Step-by-step explanation:
The box method is OP for these kind of questions
If I don't do a good job explaining it then I reccomend you consult the internet
<span>C. No, because although the results differ among the four surveys, the sample method used for all was the same. Luc RANDOMLY selects 40 students in every survey. Random selection in surveys do not create bias and the results are highly credible. This is because there are no preconceived notions or factors that affect the responses of people being surveyed.</span>
Answer: there are 8 quarters in the jar
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x represent the number of nickels that is inside the jar.
The total number of coins inside the jar is 20.
Probability is expressed as
Number of possible or favorable outcomes/total number of outcomes.
The probability of selecting a nickel is 0.6. This is expressed as
0.6 = x/20
Cross multiplying, it becomes
x = 20 × 0.6
x = 12
Since there are 12 nickels inside the jar, then the number of quarters would be
20 - 12 = 8
