Answer:
Please check the following explanation
Explanation:
Capital losses are not included in the calculation of net investment income. Therefore, $2,000 long-term capital loss would have no effect on investment income. Thus, Porters' investment income will remain $2,500.
Consequently, Porters' can deduct $2,500 of the investment interest expense and the remaining $500 of investment interest expense will be carried over to next year.
Answer:
45%
Explanation:
The market for good x is initially in equilibrium at $5. the government then places a per-unit tax on good x, as shown by the shift of s1 to s2.
As a result of the shift in the supply curve a new equilibrium price is established at $6.25
That implies that the share of the burden that consumers will bear is $1.25 (which represents 55% portion of the tax) - the difference between the previous and new equilibrium prices.
The other 45% portion of the tax will be borne by the producers
The percentage of increase or decrease in net sales revenue a decrease is 15.45%
Sales in 2024 = $110000
Sales in 2025 = $93000
Decrease in sales between two periods = ($110000 - $93000) = $17000
Percentage of decrease in sales = [($17000 / $110000 Base year) X 100]
=> 15.45% decrease in net sales revenue from 2024 to 2025
Net sales are gross sales generated by the business, excluding returns, rebates, and rebates. This number is used by analysts when making business decisions or analyzing a company's revenue growth.
Total sales are not adjusted for returns, rebates, and rebates. The earnings reported on the top line of a company's income statement are net earnings. Net sales are also known as net sales, net sales, or sales.
Revenue is the total amount of revenue from sales for a specific period. Quarters. Sales may be reported as net sales as they may include discounts and deductions from returned or damaged merchandise.
Learn more about net sales revenue here:
https://www.plagiarismremover.net/
#SPJ4
Explanation:
Looking from a fair point of view, the White owners of businesses have legitimate reasons to feel that the Act constitutes illegal reverse discrimination.
Remember, reverse discrimination implies an unfair treatment of the majority group (White owners) in an effort to please the minority group. This is evident from the fact that the 10 percent of all federal grants to be released by the Economic Development Administration was only to be used to purchase services or supplies from businesses owned and controlled by U.S. citizens belonging to one of six minority groups excluding the White business owners; making the White owners feel discriminated against.
Thus, unintentionally the Act became a reverse discrimination on White business owners.
$250000-$100000=$150000
$150000-$120000=$30000
So it's a gain, a gain of $30000
Hope this helps.
