The Huns were a group of nomadic people. They have been liked to an ethnic group in northern China (north of the territory of the Chinese Han dynasty),<span> some Romans happy about being conquered by the Huns </span> Because priscus thought that the roman laws and constitution were fair
hope this helps
Answer:
If the diameter of a microscope's field is 0.12mm, how wide is an object that fills one-quarter of the field? (Explain how you've reached your answer.)
You can claim 40 points, just go to my page and write your answer + explanation.
Explanation:
Answer: Hobbes believed people were naturally selfish and violent.
<u>Further explanation</u>:
Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
Answer:
they're probably a moderator ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ sorry
Answer:
name, lines ,mood
Explanation:
1.you should know their name
2. know what they are going to say
3. what mood are they in (happy .sad )
