A principal has a duty to blank with an agent

Suppose that Rosa is considering migration to another country. To move, she will have to spend $5,000 on transportation and $4,0

Luba_88 [7]

Answer:

Option (B) is correct.

Explanation:

Implicit costs refers to the opportunity cost that is associated with the selection of the alternative.

In this question, the Rosa wants to migrate to another country, if she do so then she have to foregone her earnings in the home country.

Therefore, Rosa's stream of future earnings in her home country is $500,000 and it is considered as implicit cost. She give up this much of income to earn $800,000.

Explicit costs includes:

(i) Transportation = $5,000

(ii) Application and other processing fees = $4,000

5 0

4 years ago

2. Max z = 3X1 + 5X2+ 4X3 S.t.2X1 +3X2 ≤ 18 2X1 + X2 ≤ 10 3X1 + 2X+4X3 ≤ 15 X1, X2, X3 ≥ 0

lions [1.4K]

The interpretation of the result is that the maximum value of the objective function is 29

<h3>How to solve and interpret the result?</h3>

The objective function is given as:

Max z = 3x₁ + 5x₂+ 4x₃

The constraints are:

2x₁ +3x₂ ≤ 18

2x₁ + x₂ ≤ 10

3x₁ + 2x₂ +4x₃ ≤ 15

x₁, x₂, x₃ ≥ 0

Subtract the second inequality from the first

2x₁ - 2x₁ + 3x₂ - x₂ ≤ 18 - 10

Evaluate the like terms

2x₂ ≤ 8

Divide by 2

x₂ ≤ 4

Substitute 4 for x₂ in 2x₁ +3x₂ ≤ 18

2x₁ +3*4 ≤ 18

This gives

2x₁ + 12 ≤ 18

Evaluate the like terms

2x₁ ≤ 6

Divide by 2

x₁ ≤ 3

Substitute 4 for x₂ and 3 for x₁ in 3x₁ + 2x₂ +4x₃ ≤ 15

3*3 + 2*4 +4x₃ ≤ 15

This gives

17 +4x₃ ≤ 15

Evaluate the like terms

4x₃ ≤ -2

Divide by 4

x₃ ≤ -0.5

From the constraints, we have:

x₁, x₂, x₃ ≥ 0

So, we set all negative values to 0

This means that:

x₃ ≤ 0

Substitute these values in the objective function

Max z = 3 * 3 + 5 * 4 + 4 * 0

Evaluate

Max z = 29

Hence, the interpretation of the result is that the maximum value is 29

Read more about objective functions at:

brainly.com/question/11206462

#SPJ1

7 0

3 years ago

Mar. 29 Received a $30,000, 60-day, 5% note dated March 29 from Karie Platt on account.

dolphi86 [110]

Answer:

Explanation:

Date Description Post. Ref. Debit Credit Assets Liabilities Equity

1 Mar.29 Notes receivable 30000 30000

2 Accounts receivable-Karie Platt 30000 -30000

3 Apr.30 Notes receivable 24000 24000

4 Accounts receivable-Jon Kelly 24000 -24000

5 May.28 Accounts receivable-Karie Platt 30250 30250

6 Notes receivable 30000 -30000

7 Income Summary ($30000 x 5% x 60/360) 250 250

8 Jun.29 Accounts receivable-Jon Kelly 24320 24320

9 Notes receivable 24000 -24000

10 Income Summary ($24000 x 8% x 60/360) 320 320

11 Aug.26 Cash 30855 30855

12 Accounts receivable-Karie Platt 30250 -30250

13 Income Summary ($30250 x 8% x 90/360) 605 605

14 Oct.22 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 24320 24320

15 Accounts receivable-Jon Kelly 24320 -24320

163745 163745 1175 0 1175

5 0

4 years ago

Can someone please help me with this!?

blondinia [14]

Answer:

Hello!

Explanation:

I will say Realism A.

5 0

3 years ago

Demelza purchased her favorite perfume three months ago, J’adore by Dior, for $75. She logs online to purchase one for her frien

Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

Option (d) is correct.

Explanation:

Initial price of perfume three years ago = $75

New price of perfume = $100

Therefore,

Percentage change in the perfume price:

= [(New price of perfume - Initial price of perfume) ÷ (Initial price of perfume)] × 100

= [($100 - $75) ÷ ($75)] × 100

= 33.33%(approx)

Hence, the percentage change in the perfume price is 33.33%.

8 0

4 years ago