1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valentinak56 [21]
4 years ago
9

How old was winston churchill when he died?

History
1 answer:
mihalych1998 [28]4 years ago
8 0
He died when he was 57 years old
You might be interested in
In Lincoln’s view, what is the meaning of the Civil War?
Murrr4er [49]

Answer:

It's a test of whether the founders were correct that all men are created equal . It's a test of whether people can still cherish liberty . It's a test of the nation can live up to its founding ideals.

THIS IS the meaning of civil war .In Lincoln view.

6 0
3 years ago
Definition:This 16th century proclamation ended the fighting between French Christians and the Huguenots and granted Protestants
Sindrei [870]

Answer:

16

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST! Is it believed all nazis were evil? IF one isn't give an example.
Feliz [49]

Answer:

We know that all people of any caste , race etc are not similar. Different people are found everywhere. Thus we can say that all Nazis were not evil. Some would be good but , they were not exposed. Even some Nazis has helped the Jews , but they were very few

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should the united states have helped germany recover from world war one?
Neko [114]
Many people believe the United States should of helped Germany after World War One. After WW1 the Treaty of Versailles created a great depression in Germany, because of the aggressive reparations. Many historians believe that the end of WW1 caused World War 2. 
4 0
3 years ago
He second part of the declaration of independence best exemplifies the __________. division of powers separation of powers natur
Kobotan [32]

Answer:  Social contract theory

By "the second part," I presume you mean the list of grievances against the British government, which followed the first section (in which natural rights were a strong emphasis).

After asserting natural rights in the opening section, saying that "all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness," then the <em>Declaration of Independence </em>goes on to give a list of "facts to be submitted to a candid world." These facts were meant to demonstrate that the British king had been seeking to establish "an absolute Tyranny over these States" (the colonial states which were declaring their independence).  This was a violation of the social contract which exists between a government and those governed.

The list of grievances against the British government included items such as:

  • The king refused to assent to laws that were wholesome and necessary for the public good.
  • The king had forbidden colonial governors to enact laws or implement laws without his assent (which, as the prior point noted, he was in no hurry to give).
  • The king forced people to give up their rights to legislative assembly or forced legislative bodies to meet in difficult places that imposed hardships on them.
  • The king dissolved legislative assemblies and then refused for a long time to have other assemblies elected.
  • The king obstructed justice in the colonies and made judges dependent on his will alone for their salaries and their tenure in office.
  • The king kept standing armies in place in the colonies in peacetime, without the consent of the colonial legislatures.
  • The king imposed taxes without the colonists' consent.

These and additional items listed in the Declaration were meant to support the colonies' position that tyranny was standard operating procedure by the British monarchy, and therefore revolution was justified.  This was based on the idea of the social contract, that a government's authority to govern came from the people, and if the government did not serve the people properly, it could be replaced.   The Declaration asserted that principle in these words:  "When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them [the people] under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."


4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was Thomas Jefferson a bit hesitant about purchasing the Louisiana Territory?
    7·2 answers
  • What did the United States do to encourage Texas to give up some of its land?
    12·2 answers
  • 50 POINTS!!<br><br>was the us becoming an imperial power a good or bad thing explain.
    6·2 answers
  • During Alexander Hamilton’s time as sectary of the treasury in 1790,the federal government
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements accurately describes the two churches shown here?The church on the left is Eastern Orthodox; t
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement describes the significance of the dragon and bull images on Babylon’s Ishtar gate?
    14·1 answer
  • Dentify the participial or infinitive phrase in each sentence.
    6·2 answers
  • WILL BRAINLIEST NEED ASAP 100 POINTS PLZ
    5·1 answer
  • According to Document A, why was George Whitefield so popular?<br>​
    8·1 answer
  • 2. This equipment can be Cleaned with a mild Cleaning solution on a damp.lint-free cloth along with a mixed drop of dishwashing
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!