1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Semenov [28]
3 years ago
9

How does the social contract lead to people being happier and safer

History
1 answer:
Katyanochek1 [597]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:Those living under a government are parties to a social contract. Each person agrees to follow the laws of the state on the condition that everyone else does the same. That way, we are all relatively safe from each other and we all benefit from the other social goods that will result.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What best defines a communist government
Umnica [9.8K]

Answer:

A communist government gives power to the party leader. A communist government is an autocracy. A communist government is led by one political party. A communist government allows for limited voting.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did television contribute to the conformity of the 1950s? Television shows encouraged people to be individuals. Television a
Serhud [2]

The correct answer is Television portrayed a lifestyle that many people tried to imitate.


The popularity of TV during the 1950's helped to shape a conformist culture in the US. A majority of the programs during this era were family friendly and portrayed an idealic, suburban lifestyle that Americans tried to imitate. This included shows like "I Love Lucy" and "Leave it to Beaver."

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Truman want to stop MacArthur from going into North Korea
Alex

On 11 April 1951, U.S. President Harry S. Truman relieved General of the Army Douglas MacArthur of his commands after MacArthur made public statements which contradicted the administration's policies. MacArthur was a popular hero of World War II who was then the commander of United Nations forces fighting in the Korean War, and his relief remains a controversial topic in the field of civil-military relations.

MacArthur led the Allied forces in the Southwest Pacific during World War II, and after the war was in charge of the occupation of Japan. When North Korea invaded South Korea in June 1950, starting the Korean War, he was designated commander of the United Nations forces defending South Korea. He conceived and executed the amphibious assault at Inchon on 15 September 1950, for which he was hailed as a military genius. However, when he followed up his victory with a full-scale invasion of North Korea on Truman's orders, China intervened in the war and inflicted a series of defeats, compelling him to withdraw from North Korea. By April 1951, the military situation had stabilized, but MacArthur's public statements became increasingly irritating to Truman, and he relieved MacArthur of his commands. The Senate Armed Services Committee and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee held a joint inquiry into the military situation and the circumstances surrounding MacArthur's relief, and concluded that "the removal of General MacArthur was within the constitutional powers of the President but the circumstances were a shock to national pride."[1]

An apolitical military was an American tradition, but one that was difficult to uphold in an era when American forces were employed overseas in large numbers. The principle of civilian control of the military was also ingrained, but the rising complexity of military technology led to the creation of a professional military. This made civilian control increasingly problematic when coupled with the constitutional division of powers between the President as commander-in-chief, and the Congress with its power to raise armies, maintain a navy, and wage wars. In relieving MacArthur for failing to "respect the authority of the President" by privately communicating with Congress, Truman upheld the President's role as pre-eminent.

3 0
3 years ago
How did railroads and ranching<br> change the landscape of the West?
KIM [24]

Answer:

The landscape of the West was formerly Indian country and now it was populated by ranchers and farmers who could move their goods with the help of the railroad. ... The railroads made the greatest change because the people to the West, They could ship goods and people on the railroads, it brought jobs, etc.

Explanation:

google

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
China was able to trade more than ever during the postclassical era because:
My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

I am right!! I took the test with my friend we got it right.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Americans react to the event at My Lai?
    15·1 answer
  • How does the internet affect the way people find and exchange information
    9·2 answers
  • Between 1763 and 1783 who lost most of their land in the east
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!
    7·1 answer
  • Ok so I’m doing a project on The Underground Railroad and I’m really struggling with the thesis (argumentative) some ideas?
    10·1 answer
  • Much of the Bill of Rights in the US Constitution was based on ideas from
    11·2 answers
  • Famous explorers of Spain and mexico
    12·2 answers
  • Which factor played a role in the East-West Schism?
    12·2 answers
  • Would anyone like to talk to me β←∵
    15·2 answers
  • “Quarrel not nor contend with thy brethren or sisters.” mean's?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!