Isn't the answer constitutional????
Answer:
Explanation: what are the choices
Answer:
Samuel has the right to an attorney if he can't afford one, and the right to a court hearing before a jury, based on Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
The nobleman allows himself to go into debt as nobles felt that they had a certain position of <u>living that was anticipated of them, and they did their</u><u> stylish to eat,</u><u> dress, and conduct themselves Ike </u><u>nobility</u><u>, indeed if they ran themselves</u><u> irretrievably into debt</u><u> doing it.</u>
<u />
<h3>What were nobleman allowed to do?</h3>
This position of vassalage was called lords, nobles, tenants in- chief, or tycoons. Within their own businesses, lords were the absolute authority. They established and administered their own legal systems, gathered levies, designed their own currency and managed how crops were grown.
<h3>What was a nobles life like?</h3>
Life was extensively better for nobles than peasants. Nobles ate veritably well from especially set foods, spent social rest time, and trained in the fighting trades. Peasants and nobles lived a teary life of constant work for veritably little gain with which they substantially bought food.
Learn more about nobleman :
brainly.com/question/3382372
#SPJ13
<u />
