Historians affect history because the bias of historians will affect the way that they record events.
Whether intentional or unintentional, many historians include bias in their writing when recording events. Bias is your personal beliefs or attitudes skewed for or against a topic that influence your writing. If a historian includes this in their writing about an event, it can change the way that the event is perceived by the public. Many historians relay the facts in a similar manner, but it is the bias that makes their stories unique from one another and also how they affect history.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Hey
Explanation:
- The army would be very advanced for its time.
- I would train my army very perfectly n make them fit
- I would use the best weapons
- Also the best armour.
If I would be so I would do the above one ..
<em><u>Hope</u></em><em><u> it's</u></em><em><u> helpful</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
<em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>if </u></em><em><u>so</u></em><em><u> mark</u></em><em><u> me</u></em><em><u> as</u></em><em><u> brainlist</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
<em><u>also</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>thank</u></em><em><u> me</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
The fall of Constantinople began with capture of the Byzantine empire's capitol by an invading Ottoman army. This downfall took place May 29, 1453, and is believed to mark the end of the Medieval period. The conquest of Constantinople also greatly impacted Christiandom, as the Muslim Ottoman armies were left unchecked.
Omission is a failure to act. There are different legal consequences.