1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anton [14]
3 years ago
15

Which of the following was evidence to support Vanzetti's innocence during the Braintree robbery and double murder trial?

History
2 answers:
Gemiola [76]3 years ago
8 0

I believe the answer is: No witness claimed to see Vanzetti during the shooting.

The defense lawyers hired by Vanzetti managed to obtain 16 witnesses who testify that they never see Vanzettin during the shooting. But the defense fail to convince the jury regarding his innocence, and Vanzetti eventually executed along with his partner for the robbery.

slava [35]3 years ago
6 0
Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were Italian-born US anarchists who were convicted of murdering a guard and a paymaster during the armed robbery of the Slater and Morrill Shoe Company on April 15, 1920, in South Braintree, Massachusetts, United States, and were executed by the electric chair seven years later at Charlestown State Prison. Both adhered to an anarchist movement that advocated relentless warfare against what they perceived as a violent and oppressive government.The police took Sacco and Vanzetti into custody primarily on the basis of two pieces of evidence. 
Sacco and Vanzetti were indicted on September 11, 1920, for the murders and the Robbery. 
right option is B 
hope it helps
You might be interested in
Eliza Lucas Pickney was a horticulturist who lived in South Carolina and experimented with many kinds of seeds and plants.
Alexxandr [17]
The answer is False. Hope it helps
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
“More than in any other era, politics in the [late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries] was revolutionary politics. It did not d
Anna35 [415]

Answer:

a) In source one, the political revolution in American and French revolutions led to barring of old traditions of royal charisma and made ploitical authorities accountable. On the other hand, source 2 says that Fench revolution and revolution in America have thought to mark emergence of citizenship but in theiri times their lessons were inconclusive. The lessons and change were realized gradually.

b) American and French revolutions removed the weight of tradition and troyal charisma and held political authorities accountable to a community of citizens

c) Within empires spaces outside Europe it was unclear whether the idea of individual rights was a necessary revolution or restricted to a certain area of the world.

Explanation:

a) Refer to following lines from source 1: " the American and French revolutionaries expanded the whole horizon of the age, opening a path of linear progress, grounding social relations for the first time on the principle of formal equality, lifting the weight of tradition and royal charisma, and instituting a system of rules that made those in political authority accountable to a community of citizens"

Refer to following lines from source 2: " The French revolution and those in North and South America have been transformed into founding myths in their respective countries and are thought to mark the emergence of citizenship, of national economies, of the very idea of the nation. But in their own time, the revolutions’ lessons were inconclusive

b) Refer to the following: "lifting the weight of tradition and royal charisma, and instituting a system of rules that made those in political authority accountable to a community of citizens"

c) Refer to the following: "and within empires’ spaces overseas it was unclear whether the idea of [individual rights] would be a contagious proposition or one [restricted to] a select few. ."

7 0
3 years ago
Provide an exaple
Shalnov [3]

Answer:

I agree with limiting the choices they can make until they are mature enough. This prevents them from doing something reckless and irresponsible in the moment. This also protects them from danger they are unaware of.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What city did alexander found on the Nile River
Luda [366]
He was found in Egypt because that is where that river is located. plz put me brainest 
5 0
3 years ago
What is the meaning of merits
Andru [333]

Answer:

the meaning of merits is advantages

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of these is an example of a monarchy?
    9·2 answers
  • The world is becoming one market instead of many national ones.
    7·2 answers
  • Why is the Silk Road a difficult concept to describe? It is not literally a silk road and it is more than just a simple trade ro
    6·1 answer
  • Which material was not used by the Nubian Artisans
    11·1 answer
  • Ottoman sultan mehmed 2 helped to strengthen the empire by?
    13·1 answer
  • What was most unusual about the western storms that that ravaged the plains during the Great Depression?
    12·2 answers
  • Who could be a citizen in ancient Athens?
    10·2 answers
  • Can you help me on these someone ill give the first person to answer brainliest
    5·1 answer
  • How long is the Term of office for Roman executive
    5·1 answer
  • Which most accurately describes the impact of European exploration and colonization of the Americas?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!