1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tema [17]
3 years ago
7

Which of these asserted that the United States had the right to intervene in the affairs of neighboring American countries, to c

ounter threats posed to its security and interests?
History
2 answers:
ohaa [14]3 years ago
7 0
Monroe Doctrine and Roosevelt Corollary--the Monroe Doctrine first set the policy that the western hemisphere was closed to colonization. The Roosevelt Corollary took it a step further by providing military behind the policy. 

Following the independence movement in the US and throughout Latin America, the US wanted to protect the area from future colonization. The Monroe Doctrine made the statement and then 80 years later the Roosevelt Corollary enforced the doctrine with our navy and army force. 
klio [65]3 years ago
4 0
The Truman doctrine is the answer I believe. 

You might be interested in
What is otitis media?
77julia77 [94]
B is the correct answer
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What role can the dissemination of news play in the development of political revolutions ?
dimulka [17.4K]
Well as I'm sure you know we live in a society greatly impacted by technology and because so everything important usually ends up on the internet, the dissemination of news helps activists and the regular joe, educate themselves. But as in a political revolution starting I suppose dissemination would make them more educated in the debate, and allow them to spread there message. 
7 0
3 years ago
How does Jean Bodin define absolute rule?
sammy [17]

The writings of Jean Bodin provides us with an early theorisation of the idea of sovereignty even though the examples he uses are quite extensive. Essential to Bodin's notion of sovereignty is that the power the sovereign holds must be absolute and permanent. If a ruler holds absolute power for the duration of his life he can be said to be sovereign. In contrast, an elected official or some other person that holds limited powers can not be described to be sovereign. Although at times Bodin suggests that the people are sovereign, his definition of sovereignty as absolute, unlimited and enduring power points purposively towards a positive association of sovereignty and a singular monarchical, or even tyrannical, power.

Another qualification that Bodin introduces into the definition of sovereignty as absolute and perpetual is one that will become increasingly important in subsequent theorisations, culminating in the work of Carl Schmitt. For Bodin, a sovereign prince is one who is exempt from obedience to the laws of his predecessors and more importantly, those issued by himself. Sovereignty rests in being above, beyond or excepted from the law. Although it occupies a subordinate place in Bodin's theorisation, it could be said that this exception from being subject to the law is the quintessential condition of sovereignty in so far as it is understood politically.

Although for Bodin sovereignty is characterised by absolute and perpetual power he goes on to make a series of important qualifications to this concept. These come from two principle concerns. The first is real politics - Bodin seems to be aware that absolute power could licence behaviour injurious to sovereign authority. Hence for example a sovereign cannot and should not confiscate property nor break contractual agreements made with other sovereigns, estates nor private persons. The second reason is Bodin's underlying theological notion of divine authority and natural law. A sovereign may put aside civil law, but he must not question natural law (in which it appears right of property is sanctioned). Saying this, it is ultimately from this divine authority that the earthly right of sovereign power is legitimated. The prince literary does god's bidding, and yet by virtue of this can do wrong. Hopefully this helps out some :)

5 0
2 years ago
When was the metric system made legal in the u.S. Was this mandatory?
MAVERICK [17]
It was made legal in 1866 and this law made it unlawful to refuse to trade or deal
7 0
2 years ago
What happened to US automobile manufacturing during the war?
SOVA2 [1]

Yes, it halted completely. No cars, commercial trucks, or auto parts were made from February 1942 to October 1945.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When was artic tudra found?
    10·2 answers
  • Plz help I've been stuck for a while:
    11·1 answer
  • If you lived under an economic system in which the government controlled all aspects of production which economic systems would
    15·1 answer
  • Who was the first person to invent the light bulb
    11·2 answers
  • How did Golda Meir contribute to the development of an independent Israel?
    6·2 answers
  • How did ethnic tensions lead to instability in Nigeria?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the two sides in the American Revolution differ?
    7·1 answer
  • Read the quote by Jane Addams.
    9·2 answers
  • What impact did the French and indian war have on colonial America?<br>​
    15·1 answer
  • For the function shown in the table, which output is incorrect?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!