Question: the major difference between an explanatory thesis and an argumentative thesis is that: Th major difference between an explanatory thesis and an argumentative thesis is that:
Answer: <u>Argumentative essays, as the name implies, is an essay in which you argue for something. Questions are often based on a selected issue like: “Is science important in our lives”, to which you will have a thesis and anti-thesis statement, supported with facts and reasoning. Most academic essays are in this format as well. Expository on the other hand is more like creative writing. As the name implies, you are trying to expose or express something. This can be a short narrative story to a question like
: “What was your best birthday ever?” or a mock letter to the question of
: “You bought something online and noticed that the product was damaged. Write a letter to the manager to seek for an exchange or refund.”</u>
<em>Hope this helps!</em>
<em>~~~~~~~~~~~~~</em>
<em>~A.W~ZoomZoom44</em>
How do the senate´s unique and formal and informal requirement support the notion that it is a more exclusive body than the House?<span>-Informal requirements: at least 30 years, citizen of the U.S for 9 years, be resident of the state representative
-Formal: upper house, only 2 members for each state 6 years terms vs. House, 2 year term.</span>How is the Senate majority leader similar to and from the speaker of the House?<span>-House of rep: (centralized strong leadership) initiate all revenue bills, Must pass all articles of impeachment, Bigger Influence on budget
-Senate: weak leadership, constant to many presidential nominations
-Similarities: No term limit, salaries, high sates income</span>In your opinion, which Senate committee- Judiciary Committee or the Foreign Relations Committee- has greater influence on American life?I believe that the judicial committee has a greater influence on American life because this committee is responsible for hearing and considering the judicial nominate to supreme court.What is the meaning of the terms filibuster and cloture?Filibuster is to talk or take a bill to death, cloture, to end a debate/ take a vote (60/100 senators for cloture to stop) (3/5 to happen)What are the benefits and drawbacks of having nearly unlimited debate?<span>-Benefits: protects rights of all senators allows minority opinions to be heard and understood
-Disadvantages: prevents critical issues.</span>On the next page compare and contrast the Senate and House of Representative using the provided diagram.<span>...</span>
In 1798 the United States stood on the brink of war with France. The Federalists believed that Democratic-Republican criticism of Federalist policies was disloyal and feared that aliens living in the United States would sympathize with the French during a war. As a result, a Federalist-controlled Congress passed four laws, known collectively as the Alien and Sedition Acts. These laws raised the residency requirements for citizenship from 5 to 14 years, authorized the President to deport aliens, and permitted their arrest, imprisonment, and deportation during wartime. The Sedition Act made it a crime for American citizens to "print, utter, or publish . . . any false, scandalous, and malicious writing" about the Government.
The laws were directed against Democratic-Republicans, the party typically favored by new citizens, and the only journalists prosecuted under the Sedition Act were editors of Democratic-Republican newspapers. Sedition Act trials, along with the Senate’s use of its contempt powers to suppress dissent, set off a firestorm of criticism against the Federalists and contributed to their defeat in the election of 1800, after which the acts were repealed or allowed to expire. The controversies surrounding them, however, provided for some of the first testings of the limits of freedom of speech and press.
This is the answer I hope I could help you!:)
