Answer:
the slope intercept form 3y-2x=9 is y=2/3x+3
Answer:
As the calculated F lies in the acceptance region therefore we conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the variability in concentration may differ for the two companies. Hence Ha is rejected and H0 is accepted.
Step-by-step explanation:
As we suspect the variability of concentration F - test is applied.
n1=10 s1=4.7
n2=16 s2=5.8
And α = 0.05.
The null and alternate hypothesis are
H0: σ₁²=σ₂² Ha: σ₁²≠σ₂²
The null hypothesis is the variability in concentration does not differ for the two companies.
against the claim
the variability in concentration may differ for the two companies
The critical region F∝(υ1,υ2) = F(0.025)9,15= 3.12
and 1/F∝(υ1,υ2) = 1/3.77= 0.26533
where υ1= n1-1= 10-1= 9 and υ2= n2-1= 16-1= 15
Test Statistic
F = s₁²/s₂²
F= 4.7²/5.8²=0.6566
Conclusion :
As the calculated F lies in the acceptance region therefore we conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the variability in concentration may differ for the two companies. Hence Ha is rejected and H0 is accepted.
38.4/x=100/32.5
multiple both sides of the equation by x
38.4=3.07692307692*x
divide both sides by the big number to get x
38.4/(big number)=x
x=12.48
Step-by-step explanation:
simply the first one.
-9x -6y = 39 is nothing else than
3x + 2x = -13 multiplied by -3
which leaves the values and solutions unchanged, as we could simply divide by -3 again and end up with the original system and its solution.
