Answer:
Effective, because it includes facts from a credible source.
Explanation:
The author offers statistics from a well-known credible organization to support their claim.
Answer:
Elisa has a deep relationship with both environments. The garden of chrysanthemums nearly seems like an extension: it's her garden, and the space and the flowers within it are responsibility her. When the environment is changed to the road, Elisa is physically and mentally also moving and shifting.
Explanation:
This answer is for the attached picture...
Question is:
It's just one paragraph proving how the setting reveals information about a character aka how Elisa leaving the ranch and going on the road into town shows her weakness= she's confident at home in her garden, but when she leaves, she shows vulnerability and weakness.
The answer is slightly obvious. Obviously we know it’s not A. The Address does not talk about how citizens have the right to rebel, so it’s not B either. The Address is not taking a tone that reveals that war is pointless, and uses no negative terms to answer that claim. It’s not C either. Your answer is D, because the Address talks about how from those that have died, the remaining have increased devotion to their cause, and to resolve the conflict so that those who have died shall not die in vain.
Answer:
I am not sure this fits the "English" category, but I would probably feel confused, and would likely complain
Explanation:
This follows my psychology of my being and likely mine alone
Answer:
In “The Most Dangerous Game,” humans are described as the one animal that can reason, but humans fall for obvious tricks and are hunted like animals. Humans use the environment to their advantage, but sometimes the environment becomes a trap.
Explanation:
if this answer helped so please mark it as brainliest
