The statement in regards Candy is that Maryann is incorrect because general damages would be presumed. Thus the correct option is (D).
<h3>What are General Damages?</h3>
Damages that inevitably and directly result from a contract breach. Or, to put it another way, those losses that, in a perfect world, every damaged party would sustain is known as the General Damages.
As per the above situation, Candy is suffering from the loss of the reputation due to the Maryann actions against her for writing the editorial and spreading the wrong news about her saloon.
Candy is the subject of the claim, and Maryann is mistaken since general damages would be assumed. hence, the appropriate choice is (D).
Learn more about breach of contract here:
brainly.com/question/24259882
#SPJ1
Answer: According to Ian Redpath and Greg Urban, the threshold amount required for conclusively stating whether a substantial basis adjustment is mandatory is $250,000. The amount required is $250,000 in order for one to know whether they are in need for a substantial basis reduction or maybe not. It's required when the amount indeed exceeds $250,000.
Explanation:
Let’s explore one by one as proposed:
An oil cartel raises oil prices: all prices in the oil-related products will increase making it more expensive for companies to be able to afford employees. As the US economy is heavily based on oil import and consumption, the unemployment rate (let´s call it UR from now on) would increase. Countries that export more than import could benefit from this scenario.
The U.S. dollar gains value against foreign currencies: It would be more expensive to produce goods in the US as its currency becomes stronger. Hence companies could choose to produce overseas, increasing the UR. One of the factors that attract investments is a cheap currency, meaning that a company could operate there at lower costs than anywhere else.
American consumers expect higher income in the future: As fights about average salary would arise between employees and companies, igniting even sindicalization, its proper to think that the same as above could occur; companies could choose to produce overseas in countries less demanding of labor rights and income, such as China provinces (I would recommend for you to watch American Factory, a awarded Netflix documentary about that subject).
Brazil experiences economic growth and increases its demand for U.S. exports: as I said in the first alternative, a country that has increased or more expensive exports could benefit from that creating more jobs, in this case decreasing the UR. If Brazil demands more US products, more has to be produced by the country, which would mean more people employed in this attractive sector.
U.S. real estate values rise: to be honest, it only affects indirectly. As housing becomes more expensive, people have to work more to be able to afford housing. That would mean they seeking better-paying jobs or in the absence of those being homeless of at least unable to buy a home. We could argue that the UR would decrease because it becomes more expensive to afford housing and hence people would migrate more but that’s a long shot rationale.
The appropriate action would be: C. <span>Thank the taxpayer, and explain that you cannot accept any payment for your services.
Government workers couldn't receive cash payment in any kind unless there is a necessary administrative purpose.
They could on the other hand, receives Gifts that held the value less than $ 20</span>
Answer:
D) 10-year, zero coupon
Explanation:
The zero coupon bonds with longer maturity period are more sensitive to interest rate changes than coupon payments bonds with the same maturity date and zero coupon bonds with shorter maturity periods.
