1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andrezito [222]
3 years ago
12

Were the ancient egyptians buried in tombs?

History
2 answers:
Juliette [100K]3 years ago
6 0
Yes they were, also called sarcophagus
Alex787 [66]3 years ago
6 0
Yes.  <span>Early Dynastic Period, </span>tombs<span> and coffins. By the First Dynasty, some </span>Egyptians were<span> wealthy enough to build </span>tombs<span> over their burials rather than placing their bodies in simple pit graves dug into the sand</span>
You might be interested in
Why did kennedy have trouble getting his legislative proposals passed by congress?
In-s [12.5K]
<span>*his lack of political experiance
*congress resisted many of JFK's ideas</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Populati
jasenka [17]

Answer:

A. Birth rate.

Explanation:

The bir th rate refers to the ratio of the number of live -born bir ths per year. In other words, it is the number of people or animals, or living beings born per year.

To measure the number of children born in a country, the best rate measure will be the bir th rate. This will provide the number(s) of babies born in that particular place in a year.

Thus, the correct answer is option A.

4 0
3 years ago
The main difference between archaeologist and anthropologist is that
Alexus [3.1K]

Anthropology is the study of all aspects of humans. Archaeology is the study of artifacts left behind by humans

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
President Wilson based the idea for the League of Nations on his strong belief in
Trava [24]
The best answer is B. United States president Woodrow Wilson is the name closely related to this. He was very concern in setting up organizations that will secure and maintain order between  nations and states. He is specifically concerned in protecting independence and sovereignty of all nations.<span />
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what ways were the successors to Augustus good for Rome? explain.
Marysya12 [62]

Answer:It is with these words that Augustus not only describes, but also justifies his unique political position. Although it is easy to see through his transparent veil, it is also easy to see how the above statement embodies both the subtly and political delicacy used by Rome's first emperor. His political power is masqueraded as personal auctoritas; his power achieved through his military supremacy passed off as rule by universal consent. To use a historical cliché, Augustus was the archetypal "master of spin".

With the gift of hindsight, even the staunchest of revisionists can acknowledge that the reign of Augustus was a clear turning point in European History. Whether or not this change was a steady evolutionary measure or a rapid revolutionary one is subject to much scrutiny. Certainly when looking at the Senate, the sheer tact of Augustus made the transition from oligarchy to autocracy seem almost seamless to his political contemporaries.[[2]] This was not to say that senators were none the wiser; the position of Augustus during the early principate developed much more organically than one could have expected. Consider the situation as thus: after the war against Antony came to a close, Augustus (or as he was known then, Octavian) was at the head of Rome's empire: he had, at his disposal, over five hundred thousand legionaries [[3]] (many of whom defected from Antony to Octavian after Actium) as well as a recently seized Ptolemaic treasury. As Tacitus puts it, "Opposition did not exist".[[4]]

With this in mind, it seems strange that Octavian developed his power base in such a piecemeal manner. Why was there such a need for subtly? If being brought up during the time of the Late Republic had taught Octavian anything, it was that overt displays of autocracy generally fed the resentment of the Senate. One only has to examine the fate of Caesar to be aware of this. However, if Octavian followed the mould of Sulla and retired directly after the civil wars, Rome would most definitely become re-enveloped by hostilities.[[5]] In the eyes of Octavian, the only way to acquire a stable, but autocratic Rome was to employ a piecemeal strategy.

This desire for subtle, gradual change is mirrored in the fact that he spent the following eight years after Actium acquiring the powers associated with the Principate. As soon as the Actium campaign came to a close, his powers of a triumvir were replaced with consecutive consulships up until 23 BC. While in this position, Octavian was voted censorial powers in 29 BC, and set about restoring order.[[6]] For a time, this worked well for Octavian. It was a flawed agreement however; rivals in the military could still be a potential threat. This was ultimately proven through the military successes of M. Lincinius Crassus, who, during a campaign in Thrace in 31 BC, won a pretext for the spolia opima.[[7]] Although awarded a triumph, Crassus was not granted the award as it overshadowed the achievements of Octavian. Realising the need to keep individuals in check, Octavian set about reforming his position; this was achieved in 27 BC through the medium of the so-called First Settlement.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was one major effect of the second great awakening
    11·2 answers
  • (01.05 LC)Who was John of Damascus?
    15·2 answers
  • The Senate power of advice and consent does not apply to
    8·2 answers
  • How did the conquest of new lands most directly contribute to economic growth?
    15·1 answer
  • The Statue of Liberty was given to the United States by France as a
    13·1 answer
  • In what way was the Scientific Revolution a cause of the Enlightenment?
    13·2 answers
  • Why did French government order their ships to attack
    11·1 answer
  • How was the Alliance System a major cause of WWI?*
    5·1 answer
  • Who is living in ruwais, UAE<br><br> A girl only i am asking
    14·1 answer
  • 15 grams is equal to tablespoon​
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!