Answer:
The correct answer is A
Explanation:
A substantial understatement may occur when tax return is understated by an amount greater than 10% of the tax required to be shown on the tax return.
Example: If a tax payer that is suppose to report a $6000 tax due and choose to report a $2000 instead, to know if a penalty will be charged or not it has to be greater than 10% of the amount which is suppose to be reported (i.e $6000 x 10% = 600) . therefore in the case shown above the penalty will be applied
Answer:
D) distributive
Explanation:
The salary is not distributed as required as per Jackie so this is perceiving distributive justice.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
<u>
Answer:1</u> The total annual cash inflows associated with the new machine for capital budgeting purposes is:
=$10000
<u>Answer:2 </u>The internal rate of return promised by the new machine to the nearest whole percent is:
Particulars Year Amount ($)
Cash outflow 0 -40000
Cash inflow 1 10000
2 10000
3 10000
4 10000
5 10000
6 10000
IRR 13%
=13% using IRR function in excel.
<u>Answer:3</u> IRR=17%
with salvage value
Particulars Year Amount ($)
Cash outflow 0 -40000
Cash inflow 1 10000
2 10000
3 10000
4 10000
5 10000
6 22000
IRR 17%
using IRR function in excel.
Answer:
C) lack of venture capital for innovative products.
Explanation:
Embryonic industries are such industries that are at the beginning stage in their life-cycle. More specifically, newly established ventures are called the embryonic industry or firm.
Options A, B, D, and E all are wrong because a new firm may not produce high qualified first products. It may not have the right complementary products, the production cost may be higher than expected, and finally, there are a few distribution points. Those lead to the slow growth of the embryonic industry.
Option C is the answer because venture capitalists like to invest in innovative products, so there should not be a lack of capital.
Answer:
1. I feel like Pat's new strategy isn't ethical. Pat doesn't pay for the suits; he just buys them and then returns them. Pat benefits, but the store he gets the suits from doesn't. In fact, they are harmed from this transaction because they are unable to have the suit for others to buy while Pat has it. There could be consequences with this strategy. For example, the suit might be damaged, and Pat won't be able to return it. Another problem is that others might find out about Pat's strategy, and they might view them as unprofessional. This is a problem for Pat since the reason Pat wore those suits was to look professional.
2. The stores are harmed from this transaction. They are unable to sell the suits to other buyers. The stores lose potential customers, so the stores lose potential money.
3. The companies should record that Pat had bought the suit only to return it the next day, so that they can act accordingly when Pat or someone else comes back to "buy" a suit.
Explanation:
