Answer:
1. In a Year 20,367 20,017
2. In a Year 21,333 21,917
3. In the case of NPW analysis Selected Target is best option because it is the better and cheaper investment while EUAM analysis states Walmart kit is better option,
4.Target is the best option because the cost difference is only around $600 which will last for 6 Years while in walmart case we will need to replace all the furniture in 3 Years .
Explanation:
1. Using NPW Analysis
Walmart Kit Target
Intial Cost 40000 65000
AMC 10000 12000
Salvage Value 12000 25000
Life Years 3 6
Total Cost
Intial Cost 40000 65000
Less Salvage 12000 25000
Balance 28000 40000
5% Interest 6000 19500
AMC PV 2.71 5.05
Amc 27100 60600
Total Cost 61100 120100
In a Year 20,367 20,017
2. Using EUAW Analysis
Walmart Kit
Target
Intial Cost 40000 65000
AMC 10000 12000
Salvage Value 12000 25000
Life Years 3 6
Total Cost
Intial Cost 40000 65000
Less Salvage 12000 25000
Balance 28000 40000
5% Interest 6000 19500
AMC 30000 72000
Total 64000 131500
In a Year 21,333 21,917
In the case of NPW analysis Selected Target is best option because it is the better and cheaper investment while EUAM analysis states Walmart kit is better option,
Target is the best option because the cost difference is only around $600 which will last for 6 Years while in walmart case we will need to replace all the furniture in 3 Years .
Hence Target product will be the best option we would advice the management to go for.
Answer:
2. Have both the buyer and seller sign required disclosures describing the designated sales agency relationship and stating that each the buyer and seller have assets of $1 million or more.
Answer:
Explanation:
If 100 shares were bought at the rate of $15 per share, then the cost of buying all would be
100 x 15 and that equals 1500.
Then if all 100 shares were sold at the rate of $21.75 each, then the total amount realized upon sales would be
100 x 21.75 and that equals 2175
The profit realized from the sales of these shares therefore would be,
profit = selling price - cost price
profit = 2175 - 1500
profit = 675
The percentage gain (profit) would be a percentage of what was spent to buy the shares before eventually selling them, so our percentage gain would be calculated as follows;
% Gain = (Profit/Cost price) x 100/1
% Gain = (675/1500) x 100
% Gain = 45
The percentage gain therefore is 45 Percent.
Answer:
there are no options and says which one of the following
Explanation:
I don't University
Answer:
Q1 True
Q2 More volatile
Q3 Pherk, Airing, Goohoo, Shexxon
Explanation:
Q1 The reason is that the greater the number of stock in the portfolio the lower is the unsystematic risk associated with the investment because the investor receives an average portfolio of investment.
Q2 The greater are the number of the investments in different stocks the lower are the chances of vulnerability. This means that Portfolio A consist lower number of investments than portfolio B in different companies which means that the return on the portfolio A will be more volatile than portfolio B.
Q3 The investments in different industries is more diversified than the investment made in similar industry. The Pherk, Airing, Goohoo and Shexxon are four different industries which means that the investment in such companies is more diversified than other investments in similar industries.
