1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natali [406]
4 years ago
14

What does "in both houses the number of representatives will be proportional" means?

History
1 answer:
Marizza181 [45]4 years ago
7 0
I'm assuming because this is under the history thread, it's dealing with the U.S. Senate. There are two main political parties in the U.S. which are Democratic and Republican- but there is also an Independent party, just not as big. Representatives are people who represent a certain party in, I believe, the Senate. So when it says "proportional", it's most likely referring to the fact there is an equal amount of representatives who are under the two big parties- the Democratic or Republican. 
You might be interested in
In what ways did the attack on Pearl Harbor influence American foreign policy?
slamgirl [31]

Answer:

it made them enter WW2 and itncmse back to them cause we bombed them. at the two cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

6 0
3 years ago
How did the Cold War shape the second half of the 20th century?
matrenka [14]

Answer:

the senses in which politics had become global. Intercontinental rockets not only meant that the most destructive weapons known could now be propelled halfway around the world in minutes but also, because of the imminent nuclear standoff they heralded, that a Cold War competition would now extend into other realms—science and technology, economic growth, social welfare, race relations, image making—in which the Soviets or Americans could try to prove that their system was the best. At the same time, the decolonization of dozens of underdeveloped states in Asia and Africa induced the superpowers to look beyond the original front lines of the Cold War in Europe and East Asia.

These technological and political revolutions would seem to have raised the United States and the Soviet Union to unequaled heights of power. The Soviets and Americans advanced rapidly in the high technology required for spaceflight and ballistic missiles, while techniques for the mobilization and management of intellectual and material resources reached a new level of sophistication, especially in the United States, through the application of systems analysis, computers, bureaucratic partnership with corporations and universities, and Keynesian “fine-tuning” of the economy.

By the mid-1960s the vigorous response of the Kennedy and Johnson administrations to the Cold War challenge seemed to ensure American technological, economic, and military primacy for the foreseeable future. A mere five to seven years later, however, it became clear that the 1960s, far from establishing an American hegemony, had in fact wrought a diffusion of world power and an erosion of the formerly rigid Cold War blocs. Western Europe and Japan, now recovered from the war, also achieved dynamic economic growth in the 1960s, reducing their relative inferiority to the United States and prompting their governments to exercise a greater independence. The Sino-Soviet split, perhaps the most important event in postwar diplomacy, shattered the unity of the Communist bloc, and Third World countries often showed themselves resistant to superpower coercion or cajoling. By 1972 the U.S.S.R., despite its achievement of relative parity in nuclear weapons, was obsessed with the prospect of a hostile China, while the United States, having squandered its wealth, prestige, and domestic tranquillity in the Vietnam War, was trying to scale back its global commitments. The Nixon Doctrine, détente with Moscow, the opening to China, and uncoupling of the dollar from gold were the symptoms of this American retreat.

4 0
3 years ago
ConcordTV: Did the media show any bias while covering the Concord City election? Explain your response.
BigorU [14]

There was an issue in the Concord city election is the fake campaign that they made because they made themselves to look trustworthy but what they showed on Tv was only enthusiasm and many people followed them because of the emotion that these people generated.

4 0
3 years ago
What showed that the united states was becoming more democratic during the jackson era?
yan [13]
During his presidency, he <span>promoted the strength of the presidency and executive branch at the expense of Congress. He tried to make the public's role in their own government larger and championed for greater rights for the common man. He came from a poor background and hated the aristocracy.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
What happens during periods of hyperinflation
Kruka [31]
The value of money decreases rapidly since there is a lot of it being made. This means that most people's money becomes worthless so your savings could be useless. People usually get really poor.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The most violent political change in Eastern Europe took place in 1989 with the revolutionary overthrow and execution of Nicolae
    10·2 answers
  • Which was not part of Johnson’s Reconstruction plan? a. That only Southern state government members who took a loyalty oath woul
    9·1 answer
  • This was an attempt by Benjamin Franklin to form a single governing body of the colonies in 1754, just as the French and Indian
    14·2 answers
  • Why do you think it took so long to grant women suffrage?
    11·1 answer
  • Captured the Holy Land
    13·1 answer
  • What term describes the idea that membership in a particular culture influences a person's behavior and beliefs? O A. Identity O
    5·1 answer
  • Why would a scientist use scanning electron microscope instead of just a light microscope to
    14·1 answer
  • The printing press made the price of books...
    8·1 answer
  • An elderly, out of work citizen, in need of income, would benefit most from which part of the New Deal? *
    9·1 answer
  • Which Soviet leader is a younger leader of the Soviet Union, was an energetic and quick-witted idealist, was the enemy of corrup
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!