Around 100 years ago, developed a distinct juvenile justice system with the purpose of diverting young offenders away from the harsh punishments of criminal courts.
The following were the fostering rehabilitation based on the needs of the particular juvenile,
- This system is intended to be distinct from adult or criminal court in several respects.
- The emphasis was to be on the child or adolescent as a person in need of aid, rather than on the act that brought him or her before the court.
- The hearings were casual, with the juvenile court judge using considerable discretion.
- Because the court was required to act in the best interests of the child, procedural safeguards afforded to adults, such as the right to an attorney and the right to know the allegations, were not accessible to the kid.
Learn more about the juvenile justice system here,
brainly.com/question/3474542
# SPJ4
Police officers should inform juveniles of their rights.
Answer:
Rule of law is a principle under which all persons, institutions, and entities are accountable to laws that are: Publicly promulgated. Equally enforced. Independently adjudicated.
Explanation:
sorry if wrong
Answer:
1.The closing of the Suez Canal by Egypt in 1956.
2.The OPEC oil embargo in 1973.
Explanation:
Most of the world's oil reserves and supply come from the Middle East. It is estimated that about 64.5 % of the world's oil supply is from the Middle East nations, making it an important aspect of the world's crude oil supply.
If these reserves or supplies were to be stopped or banned by the OPEC nations, or any of these majority supplying nations were to stop their export, then there will be a vast 'disaster' or rather 'crisis' in the nations that depend on these supplies. So, events such as <u>the 1956 closing of the Suez Canal by Egypt or the OPEC oil embargo of 1973 are proof that the Middle East nations could threaten the world's oil supply.
</u>
Thus, the correct answers are options 1 and 2.
Answer:
opposition to a strong central government, lack of a Bill of Rights, equal representation in Congress for large and small states, barriers to free commerce
Explanation:
Evaluate the arguments for and against the ratification of the Constitution. Identify arguments that impeded ratification of the Constitution. Hence opposition to a strong central government, lack of a Bill of Rights, equal representation in Congress for large and small states, barriers to free commerce.
