Two voters, al and bill, are each choosing between one of three candidates—1, 2, and 3—who are running for city council. an expe
rimental outcome specifies both al’s choice and bill’s choice, e.g., the pair (3,2). (a) list all elements of s. (b) list all outcomes in the event a that al and bill make the same choice. (c) list all outcomes in the event b that neither of them votes for candidate 2.
The number of outcomes that each of them will have to choose anyone at random is calculated below. n = 3 x 3 = 9 This is because, Al will have 3 choices and similarly, Bill will also have three choices. These outcomes are as written below. S = (1,1), (1,2), (1,3), (2, 1), (2,2), (2, 3), (3, 1), (3, 2), and (3,3)
Part B: To make the same choice, there will only be three outcomes. These are: S = (1, 1), (2, 2) and (3, 3)
Part C: If neither of them will vote for 2, there will only be four outcomes. This is because each of them will only have two choices. These are: S = (1, 1), (1, 3), (3, 1), and (3,3)
(A) Klatt should not acquire the shares until he has contacted Westtown's management and encouraged them to publicly announce the merger discussion. Kind might do fraud because he want Klatt to but 10000 for Kind's personal account.
allocate a portion of the customer's portfolio to "Dot Com" stocks that will not reduce the customer's retirement income below the amount needed for comfortable living
Explanation:
Given that the potential client is concerned that his purchasing power is decreasing and wishes to allocate an increased portion of his portfolio to aggressive growth stocks.
Hence, the best recommendation is to "allocate a portion of his portfolio to "Dot Com" stocks that will not reduce his retirement income below the amount needed for comfortable living"
Based on the inforamation provided describing the scenario it can be said that the underlined missing word is "story". That refers to the entire event that the employee was explaining, which that individual employee experienced first hand. He seems to have explained this story to show how the food co-op was evolving into a more customer service focused company that valued a very specific work ethic.
According to the law of supply, an increase in the supply of workers for a job if all other factors remain equal means the company wants to be efficient and it is also proof that the company is making more profit which signals the demand for the commodities they produced as increased drastically.
Explanation:
The law of supply work in the dimension of price, the number of goods available in the market, and it is hugely affected by demand. Now, when the price of goods decreases, it makes production by producers decrease as well and staffs are also laid off to avoid profit loss by the producers. This changes when the price of commodity increases as it makes producers of the commodity have the capacity to employ more staff to maximize time and this also causes the producers to increase sales. However, the higher demand for a commodity would also increase the supply of that commodity.
When components for a dell laptop computer are produced by a u.s. supplier, this is an example of onshoring.
A supplier is someone or enterprise that provides a product or service to any other entity. The role of a supplier in an enterprise is to offer products from a manufacturer at an awesome rate to a distributor or store for resale.
In an enterprise, a supplier is someone or an entity that provides top-notch offerings and goods from manufacturers at reasonable costs to shops or distributors for sale. They offer deliverables in the form of raw materials, which the producers later system into market-equipped stop products.
Providers are often known as the first hyperlink in a supply chain, present strictly in a B2B relationship. With the aid of comparison, a seller is a business or man or woman who purchases merchandise from a corporation, then sells them to a person else.
