Answer:
In a federal system, a national government and the state governments share power. In a unitary system, all power lies with the national government, whereas in a confederation, the vast majority of power rests with the states.
Explanation: I hope This Helps
The Senate bestreflected the goals of the supporters of the New Jersey Plan.
Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The New Jersey Program was one way of governing the United States. Instead of the nation, the plan called for one vote by each government in Congress. On 15 June 1787 William Paterson, a New Jersey representative, presented it to the Constitutional amendment.
Perhaps most notably the Connecticut Negotiation was adopted, which created a bicameral congressional concept with the United States.
The Senate divided by population in accordance with the plan of Virginia and the Senate, in compliance with the plan of New Jersey, awarded equal votes by province.
When the agreements were made, William Paterson and other delegates from smaller countries poured themselves in front of the new Constitution. Although the New Jersey Policy of Paterson was vetoed, the debates over his plan guaranteed the US. With every country having two representatives, the Senate would be organized.
Answer:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland:
-The Second Bank of the United States was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not tax a federal institution
2- Gibbons v. Ogden:
-The state of New York was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not regulate commercial activities between states.
-A state-granted one company exclusive rights over the Hudson river.
Explanation:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1819, in which the state of Maryland was barred from levying a tax on federal banks operating in its territory. As a result, the principle of federalism triumphed over state rights, while the constitutional "Necessary and Proper Clause," which allows Congress to carry out certain actions not expressly stated in the Constitution but that appear to conform with those permitted activities, remained in effect.
2- Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court decision from 1824 that upheld the federal government's authority to control interstate trade. This is due to a dispute between New York and New Jersey, which was supposed to be settled by municipal courts but ended up breaching the Supreme Court's original authority and the states' right to equality.
