It seems that you have missed to attach the excerpt for us to answer this question, so I had to look for it. Anyway, here is the answer. The excerpt relates to the premises of Brown v. Board of Education in that t<span>he Brown case addresses whether education systems separated by race limit citizens' privileges. Hope this helps.</span>
Answer:
Wildlife animals are protected by both state and federal laws.
Explanation:
People cannot have wild animals at home, because there are federal and state laws that protect these animals and prohibit them from being raised in captivity. The reason for this is simple. Wild animals have not gone through the domestication process, which means that they maintain the characteristics and needs of wildlife that can never be met by humans in a domestic environment. In short, a wild animal in captivity will live in suffering because its needs will never be met.
In <span><em>Hills Like White Elephants</em>, a couple is discussing on whether they should terminate the woman's pregnancy, which she is willing to do if it will make him happy, but he won't want her to go through it if she doesn't want to. As they wait for this <em>trip</em>, which seems to be to take them to the place where the procedure would be performed, they go back an forth on said decision.
Therefore, your best answer would be option A.</span>
Answer:
A historical narrative based on a personal account
Explanation:
This is a secondary source because the author was not there for the events and is inferring what happened based on a primary source.
Answer:
Explanation:
i think the answer might be D.
Im taking the quiz right now so i don't really know. this one just seems the most logical.
