Answer:
where's the assignment question?.
Answer:
The correct answers are answers C, D and E.
Explanation:
Simple sentences contain only one subject and one predicate. On the other hand, compound sentences contain more than one subject and more than one predicate. In other words, compound sentences are formed by two or more simple sentences.
If you can separate the sentence in two (or more) and both parts still make sense, and each one has a subject and a predicate, then we're saying this original sentence is a compound sentence.
In sentence C we have two subjects: Informational messages and sensitive messages. Each one has his predicate.
In sentence D we have two subjects: Good writers and bad writes. Each one has his predicate.
In sentence E we have two subjects: Pie charts and bar charts. Each one has his predicate.
What Serial say at an existential or spiritual level can be summarized as don't judge before you understand, and the moral associated with the purpose of life or religious matters is Love and generosity.
<h3>What is the statement by serial concerning existential or spiritual level?</h3>
The statement by Serial as regards the existential or spiritual level is about not judging anyone so quickly, that one needs to hear both sides of a story before making conclusion.
Therefore, the moral that can be associated with the purpose of life or religious matters is Love and generosity because if you love you won't judge so quick.
In Learn more about seria at;
brainly.com/question/25605883
56 divided by 4 = 14 then 56-14= 42
42 of the apples are red.
Answer:
An Ad Hominem fallacy is when someone personally attacks you to avert the audience from the real point.
Explanation:
<u>Example</u>: Person 1 - <em>"We should raise the minimum wage!"</em>
Person 2 - <em>"Oh please, don't listen to her, she's not even smart</em>
<em> enough to run a business!"</em>
Person 1 attacked Person 2 without even saying why raising the minimum wage is a bad idea. Ad Hominem is when someone insults another person instead of giving reasoning to why their opinion/statement is a bad idea. They try and steer you away from the point so that you agree with them. Maybe Person 1 isn't smart enough to run a business, but maybe she has a good idea in why they should raise the minimum wage.
