From these social classes of Medieval Europe, I consider the best is the lord/noble.
During the Middle Ages, European society was organized into different social classes. The main social classes included:
- The King and Queen.
- The lord/nobles.
- The knights.
- The serfs.
This social structure implied the king and queen had more power but also more responsibility in society. On the opposite, the serfs had less power but were not responsible for big decisions or social aspects.
Based on this, the best social position will be the one of lord/nobles because:
- They were not responsible for all the nation.
- They had power over other social levels including the serfs.
- They did not have to risk their lives to protect the king as it happened to the knights.
- They still had multiple benefits such as control over lands, access to carriages, horses, etc.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/10241847
The passage shows that Californian politics, and in particular, political advancement methods, were not wholly bound by law as they are now.
Governmental institutions and government control was weaker at that time, so it was difficult to enforce the law consistently. Because of it, people did not have a strong commitment to following legal paths for advancement. Revolutions and rebellions were more effective in seizing power than political campaigns, and there were few negative repercussions for those who chose that method.
Answer:
The first difference is that industrialization in the United States ocurred much earlier than in Japan, China, and Russia. The U.S. began to industrialize in the mid nineteenth century, while Japan industrialized in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, Russia industrialized in the early and mid twentieth century, and China industrialized in the mid and late twentieth century.
Another difference is that the United States industrialized under a market economy system, with low taxation, albeit, high tariffs. This is similar to the model that Japan used to industrialize.
Russia and China did something different. Russia, when it was part of the Soviet Union, industrialized under a planned socialist economy, where the government controlled all enterprises.
China used a mixed strategy, in which state control and economic planning was combined with private investment in some sectors, and in specific geographic locations.
The great compromise was the compromise for a two house legislature. One based off of population and one just because you were a state you get the same amount of votes as every other state. Not sure if this shows who gave up what, but the large states got a population based legislature and the small states got one not based off of population. They both got an equal say in government.
