1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ulleksa [173]
3 years ago
10

how did industrialization in the united states differ from industrialization in japan,china and russia

History
1 answer:
Fudgin [204]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The first difference is that industrialization in the United States ocurred much earlier than in Japan, China, and Russia. The U.S. began to industrialize in the mid nineteenth century, while Japan industrialized in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, Russia industrialized in the early and mid twentieth century, and China industrialized in the mid and late twentieth century.

Another difference is that the United States industrialized under a market economy system, with low taxation, albeit, high tariffs. This is similar to the model that Japan used to industrialize.

Russia and China did something different. Russia, when it was part of the Soviet Union, industrialized under a planned socialist economy, where the government controlled all enterprises.

China used a mixed strategy, in which state control and economic planning was combined with private investment in some sectors, and in specific geographic locations.

You might be interested in
Why should the patriot act be renewed.
Allushta [10]

Answer:

The Patriot Act was written following the September 11 attacks in an effort to dramatically tighten U.S. national security, particularly as it related to foreign terrorism. ... increased penalties for terrorism crimes and an expanded list of activities which would qualify someone to be charged with terrorism.

Explanation:

please mark me as the brainliest answer and please follow me

6 0
3 years ago
How did Akbar’s land policy prevent growth of feudal aristocrats “ monarchy should ever be intent on conquest?
IceJOKER [234]
<h2>Answer</h2>

By the use of Land Grants to Bureaucrats

<h3>Explanation</h3>

Mughal Empire under Emperor Akbar was at a beautiful height since he expanded the empire that Babur and Humayun had built on. In order to ensure that feudal aristocracy was not prevailing in the lands that he had captured and ruled, Akbar went on to give away lands as lifetime grants to his court bureaucrats. This meant that land could not be hoarded by a single family and that each bureaucrat would manage his portion efficiently.


4 0
3 years ago
How did Senator McCarthy make the Red Scare worse?
valina [46]

Answer: brainliest must

hope you like it

Explanation:

In the early 1950s, American leaders repeatedly told the public that they should be fearful of subversive Communist influence in their lives. Communists could be lurking anywhere, using their positions as school teachers, college professors, labor organizers, artists, or journalists to aid the program of world Communist domination. This paranoia about the internal Communist threat—what we call the Red Scare—reached a fever pitch between 1950 and 1954, when Senator Joe McCarthy of Wisconsin, a right-wing Republican, launched a series of highly publicized probes into alleged Communist penetration of the State Department, the White House, the Treasury, and even the US Army. During Eisenhower’s first two years in office, McCarthy’s shrieking denunciations and fear-mongering created a climate of fear and suspicion across the country. No one dared tangle with McCarthy for fear of being labeled disloyal.

"Any man who has been named by a either a senator or a committee or a congressman as dangerous to the welfare of this nation, his name should be submitted to the various intelligence units, and they should conduct a complete check upon him. It’s not too much to ask."

Senator Joseph McCarthy, 1953

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following illustrates Jinnah’s strongest argument for India’s partition? People from different cultures cannot main
suter [353]

Answer:

The person above me is correct

Explanation:

The answer is C, Maintaining a single country would cause discontent between majority and minority groups.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement about the leauge of nations is false
Nutka1998 [239]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which leader feared political decision making by the masses (the common, ordinary people)?
    14·1 answer
  • What contribution does von steuben make to the troops at valley forge
    7·1 answer
  • How do government corporations differ from other corporations in the united states
    8·2 answers
  • Why did Hitler most likely believe Germany had a right to invade other countries?
    13·2 answers
  • By 1968, a majority of Americans
    7·2 answers
  • What was the most devastating effect of European exploration on<br> Native Americans?
    12·2 answers
  • “ how might this “ cultural colonialism” affect asia even today ?
    8·1 answer
  • I need 3,5,9, and 10
    12·1 answer
  • What percentage of the popular vote did Clinton receive in 1992? Bush? Perot? What percentage of the electoral vote did each can
    8·1 answer
  • Which is one benefit of continuing your education after graduating high
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!