Answer: Please see below for answer.
Explanation: Matching each case with the precedent it established we have ,
Terry v. Ohio------officers can legally carry out a stop and frisk
Horton v. California-----Officers can gather evidence that is in plain view
Mapp v. Ohio-----convictions cannot be based on evidence from an illegal search.
The Fourth Amendment ensures only a fair process for searches and for seizures and it states that "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon Probable cause."
Terry v. Ohio
