1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
butalik [34]
3 years ago
14

During the Nullification Crisis of 1832, South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union because it disagreed with a federal

law regarding
History
1 answer:
nlexa [21]3 years ago
6 0

Simple Answer: Tariffs

A tariff is a tax (in this case) on imports. The South, particularly South Carolina, objected strongly to the high rate of taxation on goods she desparately needed. The rates did seem a little high -- 62% on 92% of the goods coming into South Carolina (and other southern states). For example if South Carolina want to import 1000 dollars worth of shovels, she would have to pay an additional 620 dollars to do it.

The acts of 1828 and 1832 were thought by the South to be ruinous because not only would she be forced to pay much more for basic needs, she would not be able to sell her cotton to Great Britain because of the way the tax was imposed.

Thus a very strong case was built for disobedience to the 1828 and 1832 acts.   What made those two acts a pain was that North was determined to force unity on a South that had other economic problems during the 1830s (like drought). So the nullification process meant that something had to be done or South Carolina was threatening to go to war to protect her economy.

Thus the Tariff act of 1833 was introduced, and though you have not asked anything about that, I think you should note that Act was intended to unruffle South Carolina's feathers.  It was a grand compromise devised by Andrew Jackson's administration. It succeeded until 1842 when it's tenure was up. You can read all of this by reading more about the Nullification Crisis. Be sure and read about Jackson's comments on it.  

So this rather complex turn of events all really hinged on money and standard's of living. The vocabulary used was States Rights Vs Federal Rights. Put in very simple language: who has more rights, the one or the many? It took a civil war some 30 years later to resolve that question.

You might be interested in
As a result of the Great Railroad Strike of 1877, railroad companies lost millions of dollars because
Westkost [7]
The correct answer should be b) of property damage and decreased worker productivity.

Many buildings were burned. In addition, people weren't working and without people the railroad can't earn money. That's why the correct answer is b.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was princess ariadne a heroine?
Vesna [10]

yes princess ariadne was a heroine

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The magma carts established the rule of law,which states that
igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

the king and his government was not above the law.

Explanation:

I actually hope this helps

8 0
2 years ago
Read the prompt then type the asnwer in the box.
statuscvo [17]

Answer: Here Go Your Answer I Cant Type It So I Took A ScreenShot  

6 0
2 years ago
What was the difference between the Supreme Court decisions in Sweatt v. Painter and Brown v. Board of Education? Sweatt ruled t
Naily [24]

The correct answer is "Sweatt ruled that “separate but equal” graduate and professional schools were constitutional. Brown overturned that decision."

<em>"Sweatt vs Painter" </em>ruling was successful in challenging the "separate but equal" doctrine of racial segregation established by previous case "Plessy vs Fergusson". Sweatt ultimately won the case when the Supreme Court concluded that Thurgood Marshall School of Law failed to qualify for being a "separate but equal" educational institution, as it lacked the sufficient facilities to become one.

<em>"Brown vs Board of Education"</em> ruling effectively overturned the ruling of the <em>"Plessy vs Fergusson case"</em>, when the Supreme Court indicated that state laws that permitted separate public schools were unconstitutional.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What year did gutenberg invent the printing press?
    11·2 answers
  • How did slaves contribute to the economic success of the southern colonies?
    8·2 answers
  • Which information is MOST HELPFUL to identify the social context of this speech?
    13·2 answers
  • During the rise of Jacksonian democracy in the 1820s, _______ was expanded significantly.
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following changes happened to slavery because of the war?
    9·2 answers
  • Which ethnic group immigrated in large numbers to the united states through san francisco and were eventually banned by law to i
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these affect real investment value? Check all that apply
    12·1 answer
  • Do you think the proclamation has immediate success​
    12·1 answer
  • OA<br> OB<br> OC<br> OD<br> Giving Brainly
    6·2 answers
  • Why do you think the proclamation was seen as such an important symbolic measure?.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!