1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
butalik [34]
3 years ago
14

During the Nullification Crisis of 1832, South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union because it disagreed with a federal

law regarding
History
1 answer:
nlexa [21]3 years ago
6 0

Simple Answer: Tariffs

A tariff is a tax (in this case) on imports. The South, particularly South Carolina, objected strongly to the high rate of taxation on goods she desparately needed. The rates did seem a little high -- 62% on 92% of the goods coming into South Carolina (and other southern states). For example if South Carolina want to import 1000 dollars worth of shovels, she would have to pay an additional 620 dollars to do it.

The acts of 1828 and 1832 were thought by the South to be ruinous because not only would she be forced to pay much more for basic needs, she would not be able to sell her cotton to Great Britain because of the way the tax was imposed.

Thus a very strong case was built for disobedience to the 1828 and 1832 acts.   What made those two acts a pain was that North was determined to force unity on a South that had other economic problems during the 1830s (like drought). So the nullification process meant that something had to be done or South Carolina was threatening to go to war to protect her economy.

Thus the Tariff act of 1833 was introduced, and though you have not asked anything about that, I think you should note that Act was intended to unruffle South Carolina's feathers.  It was a grand compromise devised by Andrew Jackson's administration. It succeeded until 1842 when it's tenure was up. You can read all of this by reading more about the Nullification Crisis. Be sure and read about Jackson's comments on it.  

So this rather complex turn of events all really hinged on money and standard's of living. The vocabulary used was States Rights Vs Federal Rights. Put in very simple language: who has more rights, the one or the many? It took a civil war some 30 years later to resolve that question.

You might be interested in
How did Spartan government differ from Athenian government?
Sedbober [7]
Spartan was an oligarchy, Athena was a full democracy  
8 0
3 years ago
How were hispanics in california affected by the gold rush?
lana [24]
<span>Soon after gaining independence from Spain in 1821, Mexico opened its northern coastal region of California to foreign trade. American vessels from the east were soon engaged in lucrative commerce with the Californios, Californians of Spanish or Mexican descent. Offering such necessities as cooking utensils and boots, as well as luxuries such as brandy, the Americans reaped profits of 200 to 300 percent. In exchange, the Californios exported cowhides produced on their vast coastal ranches.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Which best describe the climate of Antarctica
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
The climate of Antarctica is very very very COLD! 
Most people don't live here due to the harsh weather. For Antarctica, January is the second warmest month of the year. 
The average high temperature in January would be anywhere from 
-18 degrees F to -21 degrees F. 
The average temperature in February plummets down to -41 degrees F as its high and <span> the average low is about -45 degrees F

Good luck! :)

</span>
3 0
3 years ago
The relocation of Japanese Americans from the
Naddik [55]
The correct answer is:
<span>(4) military authorities considered them a threat to national security.

Many of them (around 60 percent) were born in the US and no longer had any contact to Japan, and some didn't even speak Japanese, yet they were considered a threat (unjustly).
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
How did the economic role of women change during the civil war?
frez [133]
More control over the family businesses: The Civil War took men away from farms, businesses, and plantations. Women were expected to take control of matters in their absence.

The war opened new economic opportunities as women were provided a chance to run family businesses. This was especially true for women in the South who had to run plantations while their husbands fought or were involved in the government. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did Japan's territory change between 1910 and 1933?
    10·2 answers
  • What were some of hoover’s key convictions about government?
    8·1 answer
  • X + 9 = 12<br> What’s the answer?
    9·2 answers
  • Who was lieutenant colonel george armstrong custer ? what all did he accomplish ?
    11·1 answer
  • I was a Portugueses nobleman who left Portugal in 1497,sailled around Africa,and reached India in May 1498
    7·1 answer
  • The 2 Chinese groups that fought one another before the invasion of Manchuria were the
    12·1 answer
  • Which dynasty follow the yuan dynasty in China
    13·2 answers
  • Which name refers to the Italian independence movement founded by Giuseppe Mazzini that combined nationalist and democratic
    8·1 answer
  • The Berlin Airlift took place after:
    12·2 answers
  • Write 5 sentences<br> What baits work best for catching fish?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!