Answer:
False
Explanation:
Suppose a firm's CFO thinks that an externality is present in a project, but that it cannot be quantified with any precision ¾ estimates of its effect would really just be guesses. In this case, the externality should be ignored ¾ i.e., not considered at all ¾ because if it were considered it would make the analysis appear more precise than it really is. This is a false statement.
"Evaluative priming" refers to how quickly a person can identify an attitude object's valence when it appears right after a positive or negative image.
<h3>Define the term evaluative priming?</h3>
A technique known as a "evaluative priming exercise" (EP) uses phrases or images to prime participants before asking them to sort the words (or images) onto categories to uncover the underlying links between concepts.
- A measure of implicit attitude based on the fact that the speed of evaluating a target attitude object is accelerated by a prime (i.e., this same prior presentation of a different attitude object)
- Evaluatively consistent the with target and inhibited by such a prime which is evaluatively inconsistent also with target.
Thus, the task is a typical indicator of implicit sentiments. "Evaluative priming" measures how quickly a subject can categorize the valence of the an attitude item when it appears just after a favorable or unfavorable image.
To know more about the priming, here
brainly.com/question/23031661
#SPJ4
Answer:
a.The ending work in process inventory is $ 146,575
Explanation:
To determine the ending work in process inventory, we need to do the following computations:
No of units in ending inventory 22,000 units
Material cost in ending inventory
22,000 units * 100 % (completion) * $ 2.65 $ 58,300
Conversion costs in ending inventory
22,000 units * 75 % (completion) * $ 5.35 <u> $ 88,275</u>
Total value of Ending work in process inventory <u> $ 146,575</u>
Answer: B - City administrator
Explanation: took the plato test
Answer:
$80,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what the amount of variable administrative cost to allocate to Department 1 would be
Variable administrative cost to allocate to Department 1=(40,000 ÷100,000) x $200,000
Variable administrative cost to allocate to Department 1=0.4×$200,000
Variable administrative cost to allocate to Department 1= $80,000
Therefore The Variable administrative cost to allocate to Department 1 would be $80,000
