Answer:
Explanation:
A major feature of dialogue is that it moves the story forward in a more straight-forward way than a narrator’s explanation would. In the example, Ford and Arthur have barely escaped the demolition of the Earth, and the conversation they hold puts us into the scene and pushes the plot to the next episode. Moreover, the attitude of Ford, who doesn’t look directly at Arthur but suddenly changes the tone of his voice and stands up with a start, makes us have a feeling that something else is going on or is about to happen.
Characters can also evolve through dialogue. In fact, in every good dialogue, at least one of the characters should undergo a change of mood. In the example, Arthur is at first intrigued, questioning Ford about his past. He then suddenly remembers what happened a few minutes ago and returns to a state of shock, moving toward panic. The remembrance makes him angry, and he finally admits that he’s panicking. By the end of the conversation, Arthur is somehow resigned. As you can see, the character goes through a lot of different moods which would lose their effect if they were described by a narrator.
Dialogue increases the story’s pace and makes it more dynamic. It will always be harder to read a whole paragraph where the narrator explains step by step the same things a dialogue can transmit in a few lines. It is clear that the sample dialogue would be very different if a narrator had to explain how Ford recalls the guy with whom he came to the Earth fifteen years ago and how a scared Arthur realizes his planet has just disappeared.
Answer:
Use ur own word
Explanation:
This exposition propels uneven prove and clarifications in supporting its examination of Kennedy’s explanatory procedures. The primary illustration employments a family representation (father, senior child, and more youthful child) in arrange to recognize the triangulation of Kennedy, the steel administrators, and the American individuals within the discourse. The student’s utilize of the family representation disentangles the setting of the discourse, and the characterization of Kennedy’s tone as fatherly isn't totally well-suited. Be that as it may, the family similarity isn't entirely wrong; it permits the understudy to get it how Kennedy is in an definitive position to settle blame: he allots blame to the senior child (the steel industry) for pointlessly incurring torment on the more youthful one (an guiltless American open). In spite of the fact that the utilize of the allegory may be strained, it in any case succeeds in highlighting the workings of sentiment. As advance prove of the unevenness of this exposition, the moment section makes an satisfactory perception almost the differentiate between The two.
An empty journal a ""compromising possession"" in oceania b. it indicates the intention to become expressive .
<h3>What are some instances of expressive?</h3>
Smiling, laughing, shouting, crying, and pouting are all expressive. So is art, whether it's music, sculpture, or writing. This is a word that uses to things that communicate. If you're not revealing how you feel, you're not being explicit.
<h3>What is expressive communication?</h3>
Expressive communication is a letter to another person. It is the means by which feelings, wants, likes, dislikes, comments, and intents are described. It can be thought of as the output. For effective transmission, both expressive and receptive contact must occur.
To learn more about Expressive communication, refer
brainly.com/question/24360512
#SPJ4
An external conflict between Gogols mother and father
