Because <span>its a system of </span>democratic governance<span> of a </span>state<span> where the </span>executive branch<span> derives its democratic legitimacy from the </span>legislature<span> (</span>parliament<span>) and is also held accountable to that legislature. In a parliamentary system, the </span>head of state<span> is normally a different person from the </span>head of government<span>. This is in contrast to a </span>presidential system<span> in a democracy, where the head of state often is also the head of government, and most importantly, the executive branch does not derive its democratic legitimacy from the legislature.
</span>
Under the<u> "principle of distributive justice",</u> an individual should never take any action that harms the least fortunate people in some way.
Distributive justice is an idea that tends to the responsibility for in a general public. It accept that there is a lot of decency in the conveyance of merchandise. Equal work ought to furnish people with an equivalent result as far as products obtained or the capacity to get merchandise. Distributive justice is missing when break even with work does not create parallel results or when an individual or a gathering gains an unbalanced measure of products.
Where it was headquarted you ask? it was in Kamakura
Answer:
I think it's all of the above
Explanation: